On 8/10/15 1:29 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2015-07-08 15:01:15 +0300, Marko Tiikkaja wrote:
+ if (confirmed_flush_lsn != InvalidTransactionId)
+ values[i++] = LSNGetDatum(confirmed_flush_lsn);
+ else
+ nulls[i++] = true;
+
On 2015-08-10 11:25:37 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 08/10/2015 11:17 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2015-08-10 07:26:29 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
So there is no conflict, but options 2) and 3) are completely redundant if
we go for 5). After investigation, I now think 5) is achievable in
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Petr Jelinek p...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2015-08-09 23:56, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
Hacker,
some time before I proposed patches implementing CREATE ACCESS METHOD.
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 5:25 AM, Shay Rojansky r...@roji.org wrote:
Thanks for the explanation Robert, that makes total sense. However, it seems
like the utility of PG's statement_timeout is much more limited than I
thought.
In case you're interested, I dug a little further and it seems that
On 2015-07-07 09:42:54 -0700, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
--- a/src/backend/replication/slot.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/slot.c
@@ -40,10 +40,10 @@
#include sys/stat.h
#include access/transam.h
+#include access/xlog_internal.h
#include common/string.h
#include miscadmin.h
#include
101 - 105 of 105 matches
Mail list logo