Re: [HACKERS] proposal: psql \setfileref

2016-10-04 Thread Gilles Darold
Le 03/10/2016 à 23:23, Gilles Darold a écrit : > Le 03/10/2016 à 23:03, Robert Haas a écrit : >> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Gilles Darold wrote: >>> 4) An other problem is that like this this patch will allow anyone to >>> upload into a >>> column the content of any system file that can be r

Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq

2016-10-04 Thread Michael Paquier
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 11:52 PM, Daniel Verite wrote: > Wouldn't pgbench benefit from it? > It was mentioned some time ago [1], in relationship to the > \into construct, how client-server latency was important enough to > justify the use of a "\;" separator between statements, to send them > as a

Re: [HACKERS] Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers

2016-10-04 Thread Ashutosh Bapat
>> >> Heuristics can not become the default behavior. A user should be given >> an option to choose a heuristic, and he should be aware of the >> pitfalls when using this heuristic. I guess, first, we need to get a >> solution which ensures that the transaction gets committed on all the >> servers

Re: [HACKERS] pg_basebackup stream xlog to tar

2016-10-04 Thread Michael Paquier
(Squashing two emails into one) On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 11:16 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > And here's yet another version, now rebased on top of the fsync and nosync > changes that got applied. My fault :p > In particular, this conflicted with pretty much every single change from the > fsync pa

<    1   2