On Jul 17, 2010, at 3:20 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On fre, 2010-07-16 at 10:31 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
The other argument that I found convincing was that if the
operator was defined to yield numeric, people might think that
the result was exact ... which of course it won't be, either way.
On Jul 15, 2010, at 7:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
* I didn't like this bit in cash_numeric():
result-n_sign_dscale = NUMERIC_SIGN(result) | fpoint;
Not only is that unwarranted chumminess with the implementation of
numeric, it's flat-out wrong. If the result isn't exactly the right
On Jun 21, 2010, at 11:47 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Yes, although the line endings are Windows format (CR/LF).
The line endings must have gotten changed in transit. My original diff used
just LF. I made it on a Mac.
The only issue is with the general guideline to make the new code
blend
Marc Fournier wrote:
But, I think you and I are exceptions here, in that we use the web interface
for moderation, and not just email ...
Is it possible that the ones that use email for moderating the lists have
aggressive spam filters? Then they might not receive most of the list postings
Thanks for the explanation of CommitFests.
On May 30, 2010, at 6:53 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
You would then generate a diff in context format and post to the
-hackers list with that file as an attachment.
I made my diff with src/tools/make_diff, as suggested in the Developer FAQ. But
On May 30, 2010, at 6:53 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
You would then generate a diff in context format and post to the
-hackers list with that file as an attachment.
Here it is:
dividing-money.diff
Description: Binary data
Don't forget to add
it to the CommitFest page:
On May 30, 2010, at 6:53 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
You would basically move the functions and their prototypes to cash.c
and cash.h, and then (instead of CREATE FUNCTION, etc.) add
corresponding entries to pg_proc.h and pg_operator.h. (If I'm
missing something, someone please jump in.) Of
I'm not quite sure how to go about changing it from an add-on function to a
built-in one. So if you want to do that, go ahead. If you'd rather I did, just
tell me how it's done.
Andy Balholm
(509) 276-2065
a...@balholm.com
On May 26, 2010, at 11:18 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Hi Andy,
Do
