should be dessigned
to cope with the posibility of not having replicated data after
commit, so, why bother with synchronous replication in the first
place?
Francisco Olarte.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
me others are easier with them is enough for allowing
them as an explicit non default for me.
Francisco Olarte.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
happily pay that
cost for the benefits of not having people unintentionally make
non-contiguous date/timestamp intervals, which I periodically suffer.
Francisco Olarte.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgres
is always that
plus the \0, or whatever your minimum is.
The problem is with anything similar to a real number, but then there
I've always opted for half-open interval, as they can cover the line
without overlapping, unlike closed ones.
Anyway, as long as anyone makes sure HALF-OPEN intervals ar
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 10:59 PM, Francisco Olarte
> <fola...@peoplecall.com> wrote:
>> For me -f & -j is not perfect, but better than not having it. It can
>> deadlock when given cert
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 4:51 AM, Jim Nasby <jim.na...@bluetreble.com> wrote:
> On 10/5/16 9:58 AM, Francisco Olarte wrote:
>> Is the system catalog a bottleneck for people who has real use for
>> paralell vacuum? I mean, to me someone who does this must have a very
&g
obert Haas wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Francisco Olarte
>>>> I don't know, but it seems like the documentation for vacuumdb
>>>> currently says, more or less, "Hey, if you use -j with -f, it may not
>>>> work!", which se
Robert:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Francisco Olarte
> <fola...@peoplecall.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon,
e I will take a look to see how complex
it will be to build to lists, paralell + serial, and loop on them.
This could be used on a first approach to split on !pg_catalog +
pg_catalog and used as a base for having and explicit list or some
flag in the catalog later.
Francisco Olarte.
--
Sent via pg
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 11:44 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Francisco Olarte
>> What messages are you seeing, exactly? "auto-deadlocking" isn't a thing.
> https://www.postgresql.org
a patch for
that file, but I'm not confident on integrating it, making git patchs
or going further, so I would like to know if doing that would be
enough and then I can give the code to someone to review or integrate
it.
Waiting for orientation.
Francisco Olarte.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers
11 matches
Mail list logo
