Robert Haas wrote:
> > "Joshua D. Drake" writes:
> >> When I set it up, it automatically appended the time so I got:
> >> postgresql.log.1231878270
> >> That seems a bit, well wrong. If I say I want postgresql.log I should
> >> get postgresql.log.
> >
> > You'd probably reconsider around the tim
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
<...>
>
> Can someone please give a good, concrete use case for this stuff? "Might
> be nice to have" doesn't cut it, I'm afraid. In particular, I'd like to
> know why logging statements won't do the trick here.
>
Please pardon the kibbitzer intrusion ...
Informix has t
David Fetter wrote"
<...>
>
> > This'd greatly simplify the
> > cleanup-dead-objects problem, and we could avoid addressing the
> > permissions problem at all, since regular SQL permissions on the table
> > would serve fine. But it's not clear what regular SQL fetch and update
> > behaviors shou
In further OT Gregory Stark wrote:
> > "Shane Ambler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> >> Robert Treat wrote:
> >>
> >>
> So is that a "golf club gun"?
>
> >>> Careful what you wish for
> >>> http://www.totallyabsurd.com/12gaugegolfclub.htm
> >>>
> >> I r
Nick wrote:
> I have a VIEW that consists of two tables, of which contain a POINT
> column. When trying to select from the view I get an error...
>
> ERROR: could not identify an ordering operator for type point
> HINT: Use an explicit ordering operator or modify the query.
>
> Any suggestions
Greg Smith wrote
> On Fri, 16 May 2008, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> > For a hard-core benchmark, I'd try EAStress (SpecJAppserver Lite)
>
> This reminds me...Jignesh had some interesting EAStress results at the
> East conference I was curious to try and replicate more publicly one day.
> Now that
FWIW,
>
> Please do tests of at least 2 minutes duration. A 1.25 second test isn't
> enough. Please confirm you have VACUUM ANALYZED each db beforehand.
>
> Have you checked that the EXPLAIN ANALYZEs are essentially identical
> also? Is the data identical on both systems?
>
I've been running s
Sorry for top-posting -- challenged reader.
Perhaps a future addition as \L ?
This command doesn't seem to be used and could be documented as being subject
to permissions and slower.
I actually would find this useful, but there are other ways of getting it. But
having the option would be nice
