Hello,
Has anybody had such problem - I tested Mammoth PostgreSQL for Windows and I
did not like that it completely killed my cygwin, did not allow console
commands to the database, etc., and then I uninstalled it.
Since then the cygwin refused to operate properly.
From Command Prompt I was
Hello everybody,
Some days ago was released pgaccess 0.98.8 This release marks the end
first phase of the work of the Redux team that came together in April
this year - Chris, Bartus, Brett, and some others.
After the release was renewed the practice weekly releases to be made.
They have the
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Marc G. Fournier writes:
It isn't, but those working on -advocacy were asked to help come up with a
stronger release *announcement* then we've had in the past ...
Consider that a failed experiment. PostgreSQL is driven by the
development
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Iavor Raytchev wrote:
I actually do not understand why is the whole cry - why not somebody who
has REALLY the marketing in his/her heart - does not make an open source
amazingly beautiful and powerful web site. You do not have to ask Bruce
for that. You get BRICOLAGE
Tom Lane wrote:
Iavor Raytchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Before the crash is this one -
FATAL 1: Sorry, too many clients already
That should be harmless --- I doubt it's relevant to the crash, unless
you have timestamps that prove it happened just before the crash.
True, after
Hello,
We just crashed a live server with a load tester. PostgreSQL tells -
-bash-2.05b$ psql
psql: FATAL 1: The database system is in recovery mode
We searched the documentation and the mailing lists, but we could not find
any instructions what to do in this case.
Shall we wait? Is a restart
Forgot to mention -
Free BSD 4.6.2
PostgreSQL 7.2.2
- Original Message -
From: Iavor Raytchev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 1:52 PM
Subject: The database system is in recovery mode
Hello,
We just crashed a live server with a load tester
? Are there anywhere advices how to handle if too
many clients try to connect?
Iavor
- Original Message -
From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Iavor Raytchev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 2:54 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] The database system is in recovery mode
Ross wrote:
I'm a bit late on this discussion, but I, for one, have liked
having
some of the pgaccess info stored with the database. That way,
no matter
what machine I connect to the DB from, I get the same set of
functions,
queries, and schema-documents.
Very much true.
A wiki page
built the first (original)
pgaccess and gave us the tool to find great enjoinment in.
Teo, we want to thank you, your place on the pgaccess table will be
always kept!
Yours for pgaccess,
Iavor Raytchev
pgaccess strategic development team
--
www.pgaccess.org
---(end
Hello everybody,
There is an open question we need broad opinion on.
Currently pgaccess stores its own data in the database it works with.
Some people do not like that. To store it elsewhere invokes a number of
issues such as:
- where is this somewhere
- converting form all versions to the new
this effort by starting collecting and writing high quality study
cases - who uses it, why do they use it, how did they started using it,
what were the pros and cons, how did it go, etc. There are not much
technical details in that. But a lot a manager needs in order to take a
decision.
Iavor
--
Iavor
I think the areas are at least two -
- funding - who funds it and areas that need funding
- PR - what I described in my previous mail
These are pretty separated.
Iavor
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
Sorry, I think I wasn't making myself clear. I think that's a
splendid idea. But I'm not sure it's worth paying for it by making
users who want the whole thing download multiple packages. Maybe I'm
alone in thinking that, however, and it's not like I feel terribly
psql is very definitely not ready, nor is pgaccess.
I could not really trace who said this.
To my understanding nobody is currently testing how pgaccess is dealing
with 7.3 Am I wrong?
Most problems we try to address now are related to pgaccess working on
most platforms (Brett fights with
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
(And that's where I'm starting to say things I've said before. So I'll
just shut up now.)
May be you can contribute some code :)
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
Hello,
pgaccess 0.98.8 weekly release 1 is available for download from the
pgaccess web site -
www.pgaccess.org
This version is the net effect of the effort started about April this year
for merging three large groups of patches accumulated by Bartus, Boyan and
Chris.
Since then the pgaccess
Hello,
I somehow feel that I do not know anymore what are the current expectations
for a release date for 7.3.
And when do you think it will be stable enough so that testing of interfaces
(like pgaccess) will be meaningful (is this the period you call 'slow
down').
Iavor
--
www.pgaccess.org
Just out of curiosity, what database is backing it?
If it isn't PostgreSQL, what about using PHP BugTracker instead? That
runs on top of PostgreSQL.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/phpbt/
Jan
Or Gborg... ;-)
http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/gborg/projdisplay.php
Hello everybody,
I want to apologise for inflating all lists (as Chris noticed) with
insignificant discussions. I would like to invite all pgaccess involved
people to restrict their postings to [EMAIL PROTECTED], unless there
is a good reason for doing it differently.
Thanks,
Iavor
PS I get
Josh Berkus said:
Iavor,
Any other suggestions?
I can tell you from experience that Double-Choco-Latte, another
PHP/PostgreSQL tool, is really set up just for single projects. So it
would work fine for PGAccess-only. However, DCL has its own problems
and is not necessarily better than
Hello,
Is there a proper 'powered by postgresql' .gif or something?
Can't find anything like this.
Iavor
--
Iavor Raytchev
very small technologies (a company of CEE Solutions)
in case of emergency -
call: + 43 676 639 46 49
or write to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.verysmall.org
Hello,
This is a short update about the current stage of pgaccess.
The development team will try to release 0.98.8 version together with
PostgreSQL 7.3
The current areas of active development are -
Boyan - the visual schema
Chris - reports and forms
There are ideas in the area of -
Jeff -
.
As we do not have much experience setting Bugzila for open source project
(we use it for internal projects - with groups and permissions), all
comments are welcome.
Iavor
--
Iavor Raytchev
very small technologies (a company of CEE Solutions)
in case of emergency -
call: + 43 676 639 46
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Mittwoch, 05. Juni 2002 17:35
To: Bruce Momjian; Iavor Raytchev
Cc: Tom Lane; Thomas Lockhart; Stanislav Grozev; Ross J. Reedstrom;
Nigel J. Andrews; Marc G. Fournier; Constantin Teodorescu; Cmaj; Boyan
Filipov; Boyan Dzambazov; Bartus. L; Brett Schwarz; pgsql-hackers
If and when patches for pgaccess appear in significant numbers and for
some reason, which I cannot imagine, this procedure doesn't end up being
practical, we can consider the alternatives. But before you spend a lot
of time building a new infrastructure, let's see some code.
--
Peter
Actually, CVS can support this just fine (I'll mention how below) but
afaict the discussion is moot because Iavor has declared that his group
prefers to take another path for now.
- Thomas
It is not 'my' group! I just happened to ask somebody in my company to patch
In the Documentation section of www.pgaccess.org I am trying to build a
small sub-section where I list with few words what people use pgaccess for.
Please, drop a line if you have been using it for something useful.
Please, drop a line if you could not use it for something due to
bugs/missing
Hello everybody,
I personally had enough discussions during the last few days. I want to
thank everybody who expressed their opinion and to remind you all that we
started as a small group of four people who actively use and patch pgaccess
now, asked by Teo to see what we can do about bringing
Thomas :)))
In Europe it is 1:40 a.m.
Wish you a good night :)
And thanks,
Iavor
--
TNGoEDWAIIAP
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2002 1:32 AM
To: Iavor Raytchev
Cc: pgsql-hackers; Tom Lane; Stanislav Grozev; Ross J
Hello everybody,
After Marc Fournier commented, it is time for pgaccess.org to make a
decision.
It is clear the project needs the following tools.
- web site
- mailing list(s)
- cvs
- bug tracking system
It is clear, that there is a small new group with fresh desire to contribute
in a
and he came back with the following e-mail -
From: Constantin Teodorescu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 11:16 PM
To: Iavor Raytchev
Cc: Boyan Dzambazov; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Future PgAccess development
Dear Iavor, Boyan, Bartus, Chris
I
Thanks Ross,
This sounds like a resolution.
I'd suggest keeping a copy of pgaccess in the main tree, as well, and
pushing versions from the development CVS over on a regular basis.
I am not a cvs expert. We will check this with Stanislav - our system
administrator, when he is back from
33 matches
Mail list logo
