Re: [HACKERS] rhel6 rpm file locations

2015-05-28 Thread Jeff Frost
by Devrim Gunduz and Jeff Frost. Adding them to the Cc list. Could you show us the copy/paste of your yum install output? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Re: [HACKERS] Data corruption issues using streaming replication on 9.0.14/9.2.5/9.3.1

2013-11-19 Thread Jeff Frost
On Nov 19, 2013, at 4:05 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: Hi, On 2013-11-19 15:53:36 -0800, Christophe Pettus wrote: From my understanding, the problem only occurs over streaming replication; if the secondary was never a hot standby, and only used the archived WAL segments,

Re: [HACKERS] Backends stalled in 'startup' state: index corruption

2012-06-10 Thread Jeff Frost
On May 26, 2012, at 9:17 AM, Tom Lane wrote: Would you guys please try this in the problem databases: select a.ctid, c.relname from pg_attribute a join pg_class c on a.attrelid=c.oid where c.relnamespace=11 and c.relkind in ('r','i') order by 1 desc; If you see any block numbers above

Re: [HACKERS] Backends stalled in 'startup' state: index corruption

2012-05-27 Thread Jeff Frost
On May 27, 2012, at 12:53 PM, Tom Lane wrote: Another thing that can be deduced from those stack traces is that sinval resets were happening. For example, in the third message linked above, the heapscan is being done to load up a relcache entry for relation 2601 (pg_am). This would be

Re: [HACKERS] Backends stalled in 'startup' state: index corruption

2012-05-25 Thread Jeff Frost
columns of the pg_attribute rows for system catalogs, and seeing if any have large block numbers. Definitely wasn't done by me and I'm pretty sure the customer wouldn't have done that either. --- Jeff Frost j...@pgexperts.com CTO, PostgreSQL Experts, Inc. Phone: 1-888-PG-EXPRT x506 FAX: 415

Re: [HACKERS] Backends stalled in 'startup' state: index corruption

2012-05-25 Thread Jeff Frost
On May 25, 2012, at 7:12 PM, Tom Lane wrote: Jeff Frost j...@pgexperts.com writes: In our customer's case, the size of pg_attribute was a little less than 1/4 of shared_buffers, so might not be the syncscan? Could you go back and double check that? If the shared_buffers setting were 7GB

Re: [DOCS] [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition

2006-10-24 Thread Jeff Frost
for both PostgreSQL and MySQL. One of my customers is trying it out currently. -- Jeff Frost, Owner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Frost Consulting, LLC http://www.frostconsultingllc.com/ Phone: 650-780-7908 FAX: 650-649-1954 ---(end of broadcast

Re: [HACKERS] [ADMIN] pg_hba.conf: 'trust' vs. 'md5' Issues

2006-09-26 Thread Jeff Frost
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Tom Lane wrote: Jeanna Geier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [ hostssl works with 'trust' but not 'md5' ] It's only when I change the connection method to 'md5' that I'm running into problems -- then I cannot connect from pgadmin or the command line. As for Jeanna's problem,

Re: [HACKERS] [ADMIN] pg_hba.conf: 'trust' vs. 'md5' Issues

2006-09-26 Thread Jeff Frost
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Jeff Frost wrote: As for Jeanna's problem, I don't see any password prompt at all in her example. I've forgotten the details, but wasn't there a password prompting problem with 8.0.x on Windows? It worked great with 8.1.4. Let me download 8.0.8 and try that on Windows

Re: [HACKERS] [ADMIN] pg_hba.conf: 'trust' vs. 'md5' Issues

2006-09-26 Thread Jeff Frost
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Tom Lane wrote: Jeff Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Do you remember if the problem was on the 8.0.8 server side that caused the lack of prompting? No, I'm pretty sure it was a client-side issue (and I thought we'd fixed it by 8.0.8 anyway, so I'm glad to see your test

Re: [HACKERS] [ADMIN] pg_hba.conf: 'trust' vs. 'md5' Issues

2006-09-26 Thread Jeff Frost
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Tom Lane wrote: Jeff Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Interestingly, I receive the same error when I disable SSL on the server: If SSL is disabled then hostssl lines in pg_hba.conf effectively become no-ops --- they can never be matched since no incoming connection

Re: [HACKERS] [ADMIN] pg_hba.conf: 'trust' vs. 'md5' Issues

2006-09-26 Thread Jeff Frost
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Jeff Frost wrote: But, when I put the trust line back with hostssl, I do not get connected as per her original indication. Of course this is with my 8.1.4 windows server and not 8.0.8. Is it possible that 8.0.8 was more liberal with the hostssl vs host interpretation

Re: [HACKERS] [ADMIN] pg_hba.conf: 'trust' vs. 'md5' Issues

2006-09-26 Thread Jeff Frost
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Jeanna Geier wrote: Any thoughts?? Like I said previously, I did build this on Windows from source so we could use the SSL option.could I have missed something when I was doing that? (It was my first time and I was following instructions from the INSTALL docs)

Re: [HACKERS] [ADMIN] pg_hba.conf: 'trust' vs. 'md5' Issues

2006-09-26 Thread Jeff Frost
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Alvaro Herrera wrote: Jeanna Geier wrote: Searched again for 'pgpass' and for the 'Application Data' directory with no luck... The file is called pgpass.conf on Windows. As for the Application Data, it may be called differently if your Windows is localized -- try

Re: [HACKERS] Cause of moving-target FSM space-needed reports

2006-09-21 Thread Jeff Frost
objects at once. Apparently, each large object is around 80MB in size, so I suspect it's not difficult to overwhelm autovacuum if you remove quite a few of these at one time. -- Jeff Frost, Owner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Frost Consulting, LLC http://www.frostconsultingllc.com/ Phone: 650-780-7908

Re: [HACKERS] [ADMIN] does wal archiving block the current client connection?

2006-05-22 Thread Jeff Frost
On Sun, 21 May 2006, Jeff Frost wrote: So the chances of the original problem being archiver related are receding... This is possible, but I guess I should try and reproduce the actual problem with the same archive_command script and a CIFS mount just to see what happens. Perhaps the real

Re: [HACKERS] [ADMIN] does wal archiving block the current client connection?

2006-05-22 Thread Jeff Frost
or inspirations, I'm all ears! -- Jeff Frost, Owner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Frost Consulting, LLC http://www.frostconsultingllc.com/ Phone: 650-780-7908 FAX: 650-649-1954 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Re: [HACKERS] [ADMIN] does wal archiving block the current client connection?

2006-05-21 Thread Jeff Frost
if that could be it. -- Jeff Frost, Owner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Frost Consulting, LLC http://www.frostconsultingllc.com/ Phone: 650-780-7908 FAX: 650-649-1954 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http

Re: [HACKERS] [ADMIN] does wal archiving block the current client connection?

2006-05-21 Thread Jeff Frost
archive_command script and a CIFS mount just to see what happens. Perhaps the real root of the problem is elsewhere, it just seems strange since the archive_command is the only postgres related process that accesses the CIFS share. More later. -- Jeff Frost, Owner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Frost

Re: [HACKERS] [ADMIN] does wal archiving block the current client connection?

2006-05-19 Thread Jeff Frost
a patch since I've already got this test case setup. -- Jeff Frost, Owner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Frost Consulting, LLC http://www.frostconsultingllc.com/ Phone: 650-780-7908 FAX: 650-649-1954 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: if posting/reading

Re: [HACKERS] [ADMIN] does wal archiving block the current client connection?

2006-05-19 Thread Jeff Frost
looked through /var/log/messages* and there wasn't a restart prior to the problem in the logs. They go back to April 16. The postmaster was restarted on May 15th (this Monday), but that was after the reported problem. -- Jeff Frost, Owner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Frost Consulting, LLC http

Re: [HACKERS] [ADMIN] does wal archiving block the current client connection?

2006-05-19 Thread Jeff Frost
to reproduce the problem? -- Jeff Frost, Owner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Frost Consulting, LLC http://www.frostconsultingllc.com/ Phone: 650-780-7908 FAX: 650-649-1954 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ