Re: GreatBridge RPMs (was: Re: [HACKERS] question)

2001-01-23 Thread Lamar Owen
ll-in work left to be done. Portability is hard. C programmers have known this for some time -- but the RPM specfile doesn't really lend itself to vast portability. Although, I am learning some real tricks that really help. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11

Re: [HACKERS] 7.1beta3-2 RPMset uploading.

2001-01-19 Thread Lamar Owen
Tom Lane wrote: Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom, try out a PPC build on this one. I know of one problem that I have to fix -- postgresql-perl fails dependencies for libpq.so (I backed out the patch to Makefile.shlib). The backend seems to build OK, but the build fails

[HACKERS] RPMset 7.1beta3-2 partially broken.

2001-01-19 Thread Lamar Owen
Lane for finding this. Sorry for the inconvenience. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11

Re: [HACKERS] Nothing larger then int8?

2001-01-17 Thread Lamar Owen
(backed by PostgreSQL since late 1997!), but the 2.5GB a day out the RealServer is the big hit -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11

Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded.

2001-01-15 Thread Lamar Owen
Peter Eisentraut wrote: Lamar Owen writes: Ok, I have a first set of 7.1beta3 RPMs uploading now. These RPMs pass regression on my home RedHat 6.2 machine, which has all locale environment variables disabled (/etc/sysconfig/i18n deleted and a reboot). Some thoughts: Re: rpm-pgsql

Re: [HACKERS] $PGDATA/base/???

2001-01-15 Thread Lamar Owen
catalogs now -- it just has to be made accessible. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11

Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded.

2001-01-15 Thread Lamar Owen
Tom Lane wrote: Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: doing. This is a fix for the broken rpm setup found on Linux-PPC, as found by Tom Lane. It would be marvelous if this would be expendable at this juncture. It is. 7.1 builds cleanly on PPC without any CFLAGS hackery. I think we

Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded.

2001-01-15 Thread Lamar Owen
Tom Lane wrote: Let me know when you think the 7.1 RPM specfile is stable enough to be worth testing, and I'll try to build PPC RPMs. Ok. Should be coincident with -2. I'm planning to have a -2 out later this week. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11

Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded.

2001-01-15 Thread Lamar Owen
Trond Eivind Glomsrd wrote: Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In particular, this was and is a RedHat-made change. It does not break anything that I am aware of, and allows the distributions to do their thing as well. Note that this wasn't included in Red Hat Linux 7... it's been

[HACKERS] 7.1beta3-2 RPMset uploading.

2001-01-15 Thread Lamar Owen
from prior RPM's removed from spec file. pg_config in -devel rpm. pg_upgrade removed. And others -- see the changelog in the spec file. BETA TEST USE ONLY! -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11

[HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded.

2001-01-14 Thread Lamar Owen
-- BY REQUEST. Please don't make me regret not waiting until a release candidate :-). -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11

[HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 in progress.

2001-01-13 Thread Lamar Owen
:-). There are substantial differences -- and that's BEFORE I reorg the packages! But, now's a good time to reorg, since whole directories are moving around Upgrading from prior releases will be unsupported for this first beta. More details later. Time to go to bed -- Lamar Owen WGCR

Re: [HACKERS] Bruce Momjian's interview in LWN.

2001-01-12 Thread Lamar Owen
inbox, I don't see the post anywhere. Hmmm Not in trash either, which I didn't empty yesterday. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11

Re: [HACKERS] Bruce Momjian's interview in LWN.

2001-01-12 Thread Lamar Owen
Bruce Momjian wrote: Lamar Owen wrote: Now that I look through my inbox, I don't see the post anywhere. Hmmm Not in trash either, which I didn't empty yesterday. That is strange. I saw it on those lists. I've been seeing some odd e-mail propagation lately. I want to say I

Re: RPMs (was Re: [HACKERS] Re: Beta2 ... ?)

2001-01-12 Thread Lamar Owen
Peter Eisentraut wrote: Lamar Owen writes: Does the python build stuff use DESTDIR these days? It does not. You'd have to delve into the internals of the Python-provided makefiles. I might just have to do that, but if you want to look then let me know because this should get fixed

Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !!

2001-01-11 Thread Lamar Owen
to expect an absolutely virgin contrib module to work everywhere in order to pass regress tests? Last I checked, two contrib modules had to be built for regression testing. But that was 7.0. (autoinc and refint.). -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11

Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !!

2001-01-11 Thread Lamar Owen
Tom Lane wrote: Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm unhappy again. Bad enough we accepted a new feature during beta; now we're going to expect an absolutely virgin contrib module to work everywhere in order to pass regress tests? Last I checked, two contrib modules had

[HACKERS] Bruce Momjian's interview in LWN.

2001-01-11 Thread Lamar Owen
In Linux Weekly News, an Interview with Bruce (from Nov 30): http://lwn.net/2001/features/Momjian/ :-) Go get'em, Bruce -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Beta2 ... ?

2001-01-10 Thread Lamar Owen
Peter Eisentraut wrote: Lamar Owen writes: Enlighten me. DESTDIR does? It installs files at a different place than where they will eventually reside. E.g., if your --prefix is /usr/local and DESTDIR=/var/tmp/foo then the files will end up in /var/tmp/foo/usr/local. This is exactly

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Beta2 ... ?

2001-01-09 Thread Lamar Owen
issue, meaning, while I will be developing patches for the RPM build, I won't expect those to be integrated into the main tarball. So, I'm plugging at it -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Beta2 ... ?

2001-01-07 Thread Lamar Owen
Oliver Elphick wrote: Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: Tom Lane wrote: Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I am inclined to wait until a Release Candidate, if we have one this go around, is available before releasing RPM's, but my mind can be changed :-) Please do make

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Beta2 ... ?

2001-01-05 Thread Lamar Owen
a Release Candidate, if we have one this go around, is available before releasing RPM's, but my mind can be changed :-) -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Beta2 ... ?

2001-01-05 Thread Lamar Owen
Tom Lane wrote: Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I am inclined to wait until a Release Candidate, if we have one this go around, is available before releasing RPM's, but my mind can be changed :-) Please do make beta RPMs available. Seems to me that there's a fair-size

Re: [HACKERS] Beta1 starting date?

2000-12-15 Thread Lamar Owen
he 7.0 RPM changes (from 6.5), and the change is positive this time. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11

[HACKERS] RPM changes for 7.1.

2000-12-11 Thread Lamar Owen
for the feedback I have received thus far! -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11

Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version

2000-12-05 Thread Lamar Owen
square peg for square holes. Choice of license for PostgreSQL is not negotiable. I don't say that as an edict from Lamar Owen (after all, I am in no position to edict anything :-)) -- I say that as a studied observation of the last times this subject has come up. I personally prefer GPL. But my personal

Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version

2000-12-05 Thread Lamar Owen
event. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11

Re: [HACKERS] Using Threads?

2000-12-04 Thread Lamar Owen
to SMP. And I say that even after using a multithreaded webserver (AOLserver) for three and a half years. Of course, AOLserver also sanely uses the multi process PostgreSQL backends in a pooled fashion, but that's beside the point. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11

Re: [HACKERS] OK, that's one LOCALE bug report too many...

2000-11-27 Thread Lamar Owen
Tom Lane wrote: Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Lamar Owen writes: Ok, let me repeat -- the '--enable-locale' setting will not affect the collation sequence problem on RedHat. If you set PostgreSQL to use locale, it uses it. If you configure PostgreSQL to not use locale

Re: [HACKERS] full text indexing

2000-11-27 Thread Lamar Owen
. And, on the RPM dist, Makefile.global isn't (yet) packaged. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11

Re: [HACKERS] Full text Indexing -out of contrib and into main..

2000-11-27 Thread Lamar Owen
the /usr/src/redhat/SPECS dir. You will then have a source tree primed for building whatever in /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/postgresql-x.y.z (where x.y.z is the version, of course). You will need python-devel installed in order to do that, however. HTH. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11

Re: [HACKERS] OK, that's one LOCALE bug report too many...

2000-11-25 Thread Lamar Owen
Peter Eisentraut wrote: Lamar Owen writes: Yes, I want to ignore their default. If you want to do that then the infinitely better solution is to compile without locale support in the first place. (Make the locale-enabled server a separate package.) Alternatively, the locale

Re: [HACKERS] OK, that's one LOCALE bug report too many...

2000-11-24 Thread Lamar Owen
. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11

Re: [HACKERS] OK, that's one LOCALE bug report too many...

2000-11-24 Thread Lamar Owen
Tom Lane wrote: Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Oh, and to make matters that much worse, on a RedHat system it doesn't matter if you build with or without --enable-locale -- locale support is in the libc used, and locale support gets used regardless of what you select

Re: [HACKERS] OK, that's one LOCALE bug report too many...

2000-11-24 Thread Lamar Owen
Tom Lane wrote: Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Collation was the same, regardless of the --enable-locale setting. I got lots of 'bug' reports about the RPM's failing Hmm. I reviewed that thread and found this comment from you: : In a nutshell, yes. /etc/sysconfig/i18n

Re: [HACKERS] OK, that's one LOCALE bug report too many...

2000-11-24 Thread Lamar Owen
. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11

Re: [HACKERS] OK, that's one LOCALE bug report too many...

2000-11-24 Thread Lamar Owen
Tom Lane wrote: Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I think your complaints about RedHat's default are right back in your lap ;-). Do you want to ignore their default, or not? Yes, I want to ignore their default. This problem is more than just cosmetic, thanks to the bugs that sparked

Re: [HACKERS] RPM's -fsigned-char (Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/utils/adt (cash.c))

2000-11-20 Thread Lamar Owen
's problem that RPM_OPT_FLAGS has a non-default char signage for PPC. So, the short term fix is to patch our spec file (which we've done for PPC). The person to inform of generic RPM issues is Jeff Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), aka Mr. Rpm. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11

Re: [HACKERS] Details for planned template0/template1 change

2000-11-13 Thread Lamar Owen
rsion to the next. All in all, sounds like you;ve done your homework again, Tom. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11

Re: [HACKERS] Details for planned template0/template1 change

2000-11-13 Thread Lamar Owen
Tom Lane wrote: Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: That is a great side-effect. Now, if there were a way to initdb just template0, leaving everything else in place, then rebuilding template1 I'm missing something --- I don't see how this affects pg_upgrade one way or the other, except

Re: [HACKERS] Thoughts on 7.0.3 pg_dump addition

2000-11-04 Thread Lamar Owen
everyone's opinions into account. This discussion just reaffirms to me why the PostgreSQL project is one of, if not _the_, best run open source projects out there. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)

2000-11-02 Thread Lamar Owen
will post a summary to announce/general today. Good. And a welcome back to Tom as well, as he went too, IIRC. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/contrib/pg_dumpaccounts (MakefileREADME pg_dumpaccounts.sh)

2000-11-02 Thread Lamar Owen
-- in fact, contrib tree changes, being that they're by nature not a part of the main tree, probably can be accomodated even when main tree changes can't. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11

Re: [HACKERS] More cvs branch problems

2000-11-02 Thread Lamar Owen
Tom Lane wrote: Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I say this because I found at least one such change -- REL7_0_PATCHES, unlike 7.0.2, has an '--enable-syslog' configure switch. That's probably the only one, since by back-patching it Marc was violating one of our standard rules

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/contrib/pg_dumpaccounts (Makefile README pg_dumpaccounts.sh)

2000-11-02 Thread Lamar Owen
functionality belongs in 7.1. Until beta -- and then a freeze there. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)

2000-10-30 Thread Lamar Owen
we can get a plan for a solution. RPM's are expected to 'rpm -U' and you can simply _use_ the new version, with little to no preparation. At least that is the theory. And it works for most packages. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)

2000-10-30 Thread Lamar Owen
Peter Eisentraut wrote: Lamar Owen writes: Getting the installation that 'make install' spits out massaged into an FHS compliant setup is the majority of the RPM's spec file. ./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc Off you go... (I'll refrain from commenting further on the FHS.) I

[HACKERS] PostgreSQL article in Linux Journal Nov 2000

2000-10-27 Thread Lamar Owen
. Oh, and MySQL beat us 2 to 1 on their 2000 Reader's choice awards. We came in second. The only other contender was Oracle. But, we were ONLY beat 2 to 1. That is an improvement. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11

[HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)

2000-10-27 Thread Lamar Owen
this message may be more incoherent than my normal scattered self] -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)

2000-10-27 Thread Lamar Owen
Tom Lane wrote: Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Unfortunately RPM deems a dependency upon libpq.so.2.0 to not be fulfilled by libpq.so.2.1 (how _can_ it know? A client linked to 2.0 might fail if 2.1 were to be loaded under it (hypothetically)). If so, I claim RPM is broken

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)

2000-10-27 Thread Lamar Owen
hat I've had to work around in the past. My current headache won't let me think straight right now, which makes it likely that I won't effectively communicate the issues. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)

2000-10-27 Thread Lamar Owen
Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote: Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Unfortunately RPM deems a dependency upon libpq.so.2.0 to not be fulfilled by libpq.so.2.1 (how _can_ it know? A client linked to 2.0 might fail if 2.1 were to be loaded under it (hypothetically)). There usually

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)

2000-10-27 Thread Lamar Owen
on my time and effort, as well as Trond's and others, to get the RPM upgrade working even remotely smoothly. And I am willing to code -- once I know how to go about doing it in the backend. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11

[HACKERS] Re: 7.0.x RPMs

2000-10-25 Thread Lamar Owen
rebuilt with -O2 or less. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11

Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: [CORE SDI ADVISORY] MySQL weak authentication]

2000-10-25 Thread Lamar Owen
Bruce Guenter wrote: On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 10:25:14AM -0400, Lamar Owen wrote: The point being is that if we offer the protocol to do it, we had better ensure its security, or someone WILL find the hole. Hopefully it will be people who want to help security and not exploit it. IMO

Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] My new job

2000-10-10 Thread Lamar Owen
Bachelor's degree in Electronics Engineering Technology. Oh well. Even I have a job to do! -- Lamar Owen WGCR Intermet Radio 1 Peter 4:11

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL virtual hosting support

2000-10-10 Thread Lamar Owen
, if I'm wrong about the placement of the socket, well, I'm just wrong -- but the vhosting feature is still nice. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11

[HACKERS] PostgreSQL backing www.royal.com

2000-10-06 Thread Lamar Owen
Here's some news for you: www.royal.com, website for Royal Corp (you know, the cash register/typewriter people) is being backed by OpenACS, which runs on top of AOLserver + PostgreSQL. See the results as www.royal.com. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11

Re: [HACKERS] Installation layout is still hazardous for shared prefixes

2000-09-29 Thread Lamar Owen
o a single private directory tree. No one is advocating removing the 'traditional' packaging from the options -- least of all me. Choice and flexibility are my bywords. Currently, the PostgreSQL installation is very inflexible WRT the directories under the installation dir. -- Lamar Owen WGC

[HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] 7.0.2 source rpm failed to compile

2000-09-26 Thread Lamar Owen
el as part of the build if python-devel isn't there. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11

<    1   2   3   4   5