Re: [HACKERS] RServ patch to support multiple slaves (sorta)

2003-06-25 Thread Michael A Nachbaur
On Wednesday 25 June 2003 08:42 am, Alvaro Herrera wrote: On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 11:11:35AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: Tom Lane wrote: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Patch applied. Thanks. Michael A Nachbaur wrote: Attached is a patch that provides *VERY* limited

Re: [HACKERS] RServ patch to support multiple slaves (sorta)

2003-06-25 Thread Michael A Nachbaur
On Thursday 19 June 2003 07:36 pm, Michael A Nachbaur wrote: Attached is a patch that provides *VERY* limited support for multiple slave servers. I haven't tested it very well, so use at your own risk (and I recommend against using it in production). snip Okay, I just did some more testing

[HACKERS] RServ patch to support multiple slaves (sorta)

2003-06-19 Thread Michael A Nachbaur
time it tried to replicate, for a variety of reasons). Anyone have any suggestions on how to improve on this? (or, if someone more familiar with this code wants to take the ball and run with it, you're welcome to). -- Michael A Nachbaur [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff -pur rserv/Replicate rserv-new

Re: [HACKERS] RBLs ... I'm tired of spam ...

2003-05-27 Thread Michael A Nachbaur
: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly -- Michael A Nachbaur [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4