Comparing with MySQL/FireBird is not to be taken other-wise. Good things
need to be taken care of if they can benefit users. Yes, it is open source
and one can contribute code. But the level of expertise and skill also
matters. PGSQL development community involve experts in the areas of RDBMS,
C/C+
I once discussed with you all regarding Oracle's FlashBack Query feature to
recover a database to a certain point of time. That time you all suggested
some indepth cons of this and how it is resource hungry.
One more feature that I am not sure PostgreSQL has is, row-level,
column-level security. O
Tuning etc.)
Considering a mature RDBMS like PostgreSQL, an intuitive GUI Control Panel
is a must.
Regards,
Rohit.
On 8/4/07, Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Rohit Khare wrote:
> > PostgreSQL has the oldest community of coders, and PostgreSQL itself is
> > the o
PostgreSQL has the oldest community of coders, and PostgreSQL itself is the
oldest product. Still its performance (in some areas) and GUI does not match
MySQL. MySQL .NET Driver gives very good performance for the MySQL Database,
FireBird .NET Driver gives performance for FireBird.
Not only it is
I used NPGSQL .NET driver to connect PGSQL 8.2.4 database to VB.NET. As
stated on NPGSQL page, it doesn't seem to provide seamless integration and
performance with .NET. Instead when I used ODBC, the performance was
comparatively better. What's the reason? When can we expect .NET driver that
provid
