[HACKERS] Old interfaces directory in CVS tree?

2005-11-04 Thread jtv
A libpqxx user just informed me that the anonymous CVS repository at anoncvs.postgresql.org still contained a 2002 version of libpqxx in the interfaces directory. I checked it out and otherwise it seems to be the current source tree--at least I found an 8.1 version number somewhere. Could someone

Re: [HACKERS] Differences in UTF8 between 8.0 and 8.1

2005-10-26 Thread jtv
Andrej Ricnik-Bay wrote: > How about an ugly kludge ... > > split -a 3 -d -b 1048576 ../path/to/dumpfile dumpfile > for i in `ls -1 dumpfile*`; do iconv -c -f UTF8 -t UTF8 $i;done > cat dumpfile* > new_dump Not with UTF-8... You might break in the middle of a multibyte character. Jeroen

Re: [HACKERS] transactions not working properly ?

2005-08-17 Thread jtv
Ali Baba wrote: > can any one describe how the transaction are being > handled in postgres. Pretty much the same as in any other SQL implementation, and you'd have the same problem in any database. Is this a homework assignment? Jeroen ---(end of broadcast)--

Re: [HACKERS] pgFoundry

2005-05-05 Thread jtv
> PgFoundry has been brought up quite a bit lately. How we want > it to succeed, how we want it to be the hub of PostgreSQL development. > So my question is... Why isn't it? Speaking only for myself, I volunteered to have my project moved over first as a test case. This was agreed, the original p

Re: [HACKERS] Name change proposal

2005-04-01 Thread jtv
> I'd like to propose that we abandon the name "PostgreSQL" and rename the > project "Postgre", to be pronounced either "post-greh" or "post-gree". > This change would have a twofold purpose: it would meet popular demand, > and it would reflect my next proposal, that we abandon SQL as the query > l

Re: [HACKERS] Finding if old transactions are running...

2005-02-24 Thread jtv
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > pg_locks certainly seems like a better solution. Perhaps it didn't > exist when you went with pg_stat_activity? Can't recall offhand. Neither do I... But I do need something that will work with at least any recent backend version--say, 7.2 or since. The more the

Re: [HACKERS] Finding if old transactions are running...

2005-02-24 Thread jtv
Bruce Momjian wrote: >> > You can get that from pg_stat_activity, if you have the relevant stats >> > turned on. >> >> pg_stat_activity will tell you about the oldest active query, but not >> about oldest open transaction. > > And pg_stat_activity can lose information when the network is under > h

Re: Trim the Fat (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Open 7.3 items )

2002-08-01 Thread jtv
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 02:08:33PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > Who cares? Those that need a C++ interface will know where to find it, > and will report bugs that they have ... why should it be tested on every > platform when we *might* only have those on the Linux platform using it? Wel

Re: [HACKERS] Unintegrated stuff in source tree

2002-07-09 Thread jtv
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 11:20:47PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > Has the author been given CVS access yet? > > Yes, he has. I got him in touch with Marc. I was just pointing out > that while he knows C++, he needs help getting the connecting stuff > merged to our coding style. Haven't h

Re: [HACKERS] Unintegrated stuff in source tree

2002-07-09 Thread jtv
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 12:18:16AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > There seems to have been an accumulation lately of stuff that was simply > dumped into the source tree without any sort of integration. I am > particularly talking about interfaces/ssl and interfaces/libpqxx. No > doubt both of

Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ build problems

2002-07-03 Thread jtv
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 01:45:56PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Actually, I am confused. In src/template/freebsd I see: > > CFLAGS='-pipe' > > case $host_cpu in > alpha*) CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -O";; > i386*)CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -O2";; > esac > > so w

Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ build problems

2002-07-03 Thread jtv
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 02:25:46PM +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > OK, this is what I'm seeing on FreeBSD/Alpha for libpq++. [cut] [paste] > cc1plus: warning: > *** > *** The -O2 flag TRIGGERS KNOWN OPTIMIZER BUGS ON THIS PLATFORM > *** Doesn't say it doesn't work though... Have

Re: [HACKERS] database access via c++ program...

2002-06-26 Thread jtv
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 12:22:54PM +0900, Emilio Uy III wrote: > > I am just wondering, because I have installed PostgreSQL on my Cygwin > (Windows NT) and this is my first time to attempt a dive into the database > realm. I am not sure of this, but there should be a way to access a database > th