Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
On 12/30/2014 09:20 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
In one light this is certainly a bug fix, but in another it's just
definitional instability.
If we'd gotten a field bug report we might well have chosen to back-patch,
though, and perhaps your client's
--On 29. Dezember 2014 12:55:11 -0500 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Given the lack of previous complaints, this probably isn't backpatching
material, but it sure seems like a bit of attention to consistency
would be warranted here.
Now that i read it i remember a client complaining
Bernd Helmle maili...@oopsware.de writes:
--On 29. Dezember 2014 12:55:11 -0500 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Given the lack of previous complaints, this probably isn't backpatching
material, but it sure seems like a bit of attention to consistency
would be warranted here.
Now that i
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Adrian Klaver adrian.kla...@aklaver.com
wrote:
On 12/30/2014 07:43 AM, David G Johnston wrote:
Tom Lane-2 wrote
Bernd Helmle lt;
mailings@
gt; writes:
--On 29. Dezember 2014 12:55:11 -0500 Tom Lane lt;
tgl@.pa
gt; wrote:
Given the lack of
On 12/30/2014 09:20 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Bernd Helmle maili...@oopsware.de writes:
--On 29. Dezember 2014 12:55:11 -0500 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Given the lack of previous complaints, this probably isn't backpatching
material, but it sure seems like a bit of attention to consistency
Adrian Klaver adrian.kla...@aklaver.com writes:
So it seems you can turn ON_ERROR_ROLLBACK on with either 1 or 'on', but you
can only turn it off with 'off'.
With ON_ERROR_STOP 1/on and 0/off both seem to work.
Is this expected?
on_error_stop_hook() uses ParseVariableBool, while
On 12/29/2014 09:55 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Adrian Klaver adrian.kla...@aklaver.com writes:
So it seems you can turn ON_ERROR_ROLLBACK on with either 1 or 'on', but you
can only turn it off with 'off'.
With ON_ERROR_STOP 1/on and 0/off both seem to work.
Is this expected?
Given the lack
