Thank you very much for refining patch.
I thought there is no missing part.
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:42, Tsutomu Yamada tsut...@sraoss.co.jp wrote:
The following patches support Windows x64.
1) use intptr_t for Datum and pointer macros. (to
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:42, Tsutomu Yamada tsut...@sraoss.co.jp wrote:
The following patches support Windows x64.
1) use intptr_t for Datum and pointer macros. (to support Windows LLP64)
almost the same as that post before.
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:42, Tsutomu Yamada tsut...@sraoss.co.jp wrote:
I was checked where the string converted with %ld is used.
An especially fatal part is not found excluding one of plperl.
I have not looked at the plperl stuff yet. I'd
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 20:45, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:42, Tsutomu Yamada tsut...@sraoss.co.jp wrote:
2) use appropriate macro and datatypes for Windows API.
enables more than 32bits shared
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 09:14, Tsutomu Yamada tsut...@sraoss.co.jp wrote:
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 20:45, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:42, Tsutomu Yamada tsut...@sraoss.co.jp
wrote:
2) use appropriate
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
2009/12/4 Tsutomu Yamada tsut...@sraoss.co.jp:
Thanks to suggestion.
I send pathces again by another mailer for the archive.
Sorry to waste resources, below is same content that I send before.
I have a couple of comments about the
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 12:58, Tsutomu Yamada tsut...@sraoss.co.jp wrote:
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
2009/12/4 Tsutomu Yamada tsut...@sraoss.co.jp:
Thanks to suggestion.
I send pathces again by another mailer for the archive.
Sorry to waste resources, below is
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 20:45, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:42, Tsutomu Yamada tsut...@sraoss.co.jp wrote:
2) use appropriate macro and datatypes for Windows API.
enables more than 32bits shared memory.
Are you sure this one should use __noop, and not
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:42, Tsutomu Yamada tsut...@sraoss.co.jp wrote:
2) use appropriate macro and datatypes for Windows API.
enables more than 32bits shared memory.
Are you sure this one should use __noop, and not __nop?
__noop: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/s6btaxcs.aspx
2009/12/31 Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net:
2009/12/4 Tsutomu Yamada tsut...@sraoss.co.jp:
A bit further down, it has:
+ /* The size of `void *', as computed by sizeof. */
+ #define SIZEOF_VOID_P 4
+
shouldn't that be 8 for win64 platforms?
Nevermind this second comment. Now that
2009/12/4 Tsutomu Yamada tsut...@sraoss.co.jp:
Thanks to suggestion.
I send pathces again by another mailer for the archive.
Sorry to waste resources, below is same content that I send before.
I have a couple of comments about the first patch (I'll get to the
others later):
config.win32.h
Tatsuo,
Ok. Your suggestion is very helpfull. In general Tsutomu will wait for
feedbacks come in, probably until Jan 15th.
BTW, is there anyone who wishes the patches get in 8.5? Apparently
Tstutomu, Magnus and I are counted in the group:-) But I'd like to
know how other people are
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Massa, Harald Armin c...@ghum.de wrote:
Tatsuo,
Ok. Your suggestion is very helpfull. In general Tsutomu will wait for
feedbacks come in, probably until Jan 15th.
BTW, is there anyone who wishes the patches get in 8.5? Apparently
Tstutomu, Magnus and I are
Tatsuo,
Ok. Your suggestion is very helpfull. In general Tsutomu will wait for
feedbacks come in, probably until Jan 15th.
BTW, is there anyone who wishes the patches get in 8.5? Apparently
Tstutomu, Magnus and I are counted in the group:-) But I'd like to
know how other people are
BTW, is there anyone who wishes the patches get in 8.5? Apparently
Tstutomu, Magnus and I are counted in the group:-) But I'd like to
know how other people are interested in the patches.
I am very interested. A 64bit-Windows-Version would give a boost
perception-wise
I'm also very
2009/12/9 Tatsuo Ishii is...@postgresql.org:
Ok. Your suggestion is very helpfull. In general Tsutomu will wait for
feedbacks come in, probably until Jan 15th.
Of course there's also no rule that you couldn't review these sooner -
that might help get the ball rolling!
Of course I did
As a reference for the future, please let us know when you have done
this before the patch is submitted. I think it's not very common that
just because you are in the same company, you have reviewed it. For
example, I highly doubt that Heikki reviews all the patches Bruce
post, or the other
Magnus,
Just in case anybody was wondering, I've added myself as a reviewer of
this one for next commitfest - I doubt that's very surprising :-)
Others are of course more than welcome to chip in!
Greg Smith wrote:
There are also a couple of patches that for various reasons have yet to
get
Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
Now that Greg is going to close the Nov Commit Festa, I think he is
requesting initial reviews for the patches.
While Magnus might take a look anyway, in general we'll all be taking a
break from review until January 15th, when the final CommitFest for this
version
Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
Now that Greg is going to close the Nov Commit Festa, I think he is
requesting initial reviews for the patches.
While Magnus might take a look anyway, in general we'll all be taking a
break from review until January 15th, when the final CommitFest for this
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Tatsuo Ishii is...@postgresql.org wrote:
Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
Now that Greg is going to close the Nov Commit Festa, I think he is
requesting initial reviews for the patches.
While Magnus might take a look anyway, in general we'll all be taking a
break from
Ok. Your suggestion is very helpfull. In general Tsutomu will wait for
feedbacks come in, probably until Jan 15th.
Of course there's also no rule that you couldn't review these sooner -
that might help get the ball rolling!
Of course I did before he publishes the patches. (I and he are
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Tatsuo Ishii is...@postgresql.org wrote:
Ok. Your suggestion is very helpfull. In general Tsutomu will wait for
feedbacks come in, probably until Jan 15th.
Of course there's also no rule that you couldn't review these sooner -
that might help get the ball
2009/12/4 Tsutomu Yamada tsut...@sraoss.co.jp:
Thanks to suggestion.
I send pathces again by another mailer for the archive.
Sorry to waste resources, below is same content that I send before.
Just in case anybody was wondering, I've added myself as a reviewer of
this one for next commitfest
Thanks to suggestion.
I send pathces again by another mailer for the archive.
Sorry to waste resources, below is same content that I send before.
Tsutomu Yamada
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
#
The following patches support Windows x64.
1) use intptr_t for Datum and pointer macros. (to support
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 6:25 AM, Tsutomu Yamada tsut...@sraoss.co.jp wrote:
Hello.
The following patches support Windows x64.
1) use intptr_t for Datum and pointer macros. (to support Windows LLP64)
almost the same as that post before.
Tsutomu Yamada wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 6:25 AM, Tsutomu Yamada tsut...@sraoss.co.jp wrote:
Hello.
The following patches support Windows x64.
1) use intptr_t for Datum and pointer macros. (to support Windows LLP64)
almost the
Stefan Kaltenbrunner escribió:
Tsutomu Yamada wrote:
However, archive.postgresql.org has deleted the attachment.
(Why? Email sent to the individual, the attachment is included.)
Is it too large ?
Should I resend them separately or compressing ?
wrong mail format ?
Should I try another
Hello.
The following patches support Windows x64.
1) use intptr_t for Datum and pointer macros. (to support Windows LLP64)
almost the same as that post before.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-06/threads.php#01364
2) use appropriate macro and datatypes for Windows API.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 6:25 AM, Tsutomu Yamada tsut...@sraoss.co.jp wrote:
Hello.
The following patches support Windows x64.
1) use intptr_t for Datum and pointer macros. (to support Windows LLP64)
almost the same as that post before.
30 matches
Mail list logo
