Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Took me a while, but I eventually figured out that they changed the
> NAMEDATALEN in the old version, and didn't match it in the new one.
Grumble. It occured to us to store NAMEDATALEN in pg_control in 7.3,
but 7.2 doesn't have that defense. Sorry bout t
On Tue, 2002-09-03 at 16:42, Tom Lane wrote:
> Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > DEBUG: server process (pid 9097) was terminated by signal 10
>
> Could we have a backtrace from that core dump?
>
> AFAICT it's getting through the WAL redo just fine, so the problem
> is (probably) not wh
Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> DEBUG: server process (pid 9097) was terminated by signal 10
Could we have a backtrace from that core dump?
AFAICT it's getting through the WAL redo just fine, so the problem
is (probably) not what you think.
regards, tom lane
-
Seems it wants to run a redo entry that doesn't exist.
Not a big deal as it's a test environment only. It was recently
upgraded from 7.2.1 to 7.2.2. I'm wondering whether the person who did
the upgrade shutdown the daemon before installing.
FATAL 1: The database system is starting up
FATAL
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Tue, 14 May 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I don't know whether we will bother with a 7.2.2 release ---
>
> > We could do up a 7.2.2 ...
>
> If ya wanna do one, no objection here. But let's see if we can't g
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 14 May 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I don't know whether we will bother with a 7.2.2 release ---
> We could do up a 7.2.2 ...
If ya wanna do one, no objection here. But let's see if we can't get
some resolution of that command-tags-and-rules
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> Oleg Bartunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > We have one patch for contrib/rtree_gist ( thanks Chris Hodgson for
> > spotting bug and test suite ). Should we submit patch for 7.2.2 and
> > 7.3 ?
>
> I don't know whether we will bother with a 7.2.2 release
Oleg Bartunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We have one patch for contrib/rtree_gist ( thanks Chris Hodgson for
> spotting bug and test suite ). Should we submit patch for 7.2.2 and
> 7.3 ?
I don't know whether we will bother with a 7.2.2 release --- but if it's
a high-confidence bug fix, sure,
We have one patch for contrib/rtree_gist ( thanks Chris Hodgson for
spotting bug and test suite ). Should we submit patch for 7.2.2 and
7.3 ?
Regards,
Oleg
_
Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
