Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 schedule

2011-05-24 Thread David Fetter
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 10:44:20PM -0400, Greg Smith wrote: At the developer meeting last week: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PgCon_2011_Developer_Meeting there was an initial schedule for 9.2 hammered out and dutifully transcribed at

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 schedule

2011-05-24 Thread Robert Haas
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:33 AM, David Fetter da...@fetter.org wrote: On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 10:44:20PM -0400, Greg Smith wrote: At the developer meeting last week: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PgCon_2011_Developer_Meeting there was an initial schedule for 9.2 hammered out and dutifully

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 schedule

2011-05-24 Thread David Fetter
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:54:19AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:33 AM, David Fetter da...@fetter.org wrote: On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 10:44:20PM -0400, Greg Smith wrote: At the developer meeting last week: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PgCon_2011_Developer_Meeting

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 schedule

2011-05-24 Thread Greg Smith
David Fetter wrote: I thought we'd agreed on the timing for the first CF, and that I was to announce it in the PostgreSQL Weekly News, so I did just that. Yes, and excellent. The other ideas were: -Publish information about the full schedule to some of the more popular mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 schedule

2011-05-24 Thread Josh Berkus
Robert, -Publish information about the full schedule to some of the more popular mailing lists I think that posting to pgsql-announce and PostgreSQL.org news, and this list would be sufficient. I'm happy to take care of that. -Link to this page more obviously from postgresql.org (fixed

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 schedule

2011-05-24 Thread Robert Haas
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote: Robert, Actually, you're responding to Greg, not me. But +1 for your suggestions. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 schedule

2011-05-24 Thread Josh Berkus
Actually, you're responding to Greg, not me. Sorry. But +1 for your suggestions. Any objections before I post something? Greg? -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 schedule

2011-05-24 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On mån, 2011-05-23 at 22:44 -0400, Greg Smith wrote: -Given that work in August is particularly difficult to line up with common summer schedules around the world, having the other 1 month gap in the schedule go there makes sense. You might want to add a comment on the schedule page about

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 schedule

2011-05-24 Thread Greg Smith
On 05/24/2011 05:03 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: On mån, 2011-05-23 at 22:44 -0400, Greg Smith wrote: -Given that work in August is particularly difficult to line up with common summer schedules around the world, having the other1 month gap in the schedule go there makes sense. You

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 schedule

2011-05-24 Thread Greg Smith
On 05/24/2011 01:35 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: I would suggest instead adding a new page to postgresql.org/developer which lists the development schedule, rather than linking to that wiki page. Maybe on this page? http://www.postgresql.org/developer/roadmap Now that I look at the roadmap

[HACKERS] 9.2 schedule

2011-05-23 Thread Greg Smith
At the developer meeting last week: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PgCon_2011_Developer_Meeting there was an initial schedule for 9.2 hammered out and dutifully transcribed at http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.2_Development_Plan , and the one part I wasn't sure I had written down