David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 10:06:33PM -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
>> Any thoughts on just making it always print that way and getting rid
>> of the GUC? Anyone want to argue they'll be turning this off?
> I can vaguely imagine somebody wanting to debug the
Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday 19 August 2008 12:40:11 Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'd also like to propose making debug_pretty_print default to ON.
>> At least for me, the other formatting is 100% unreadable.
> Any thoughts on just making it always print that way and getting rid of
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 10:06:33PM -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 August 2008 12:40:11 Tom Lane wrote:
> > I'd also like to propose making debug_pretty_print default to ON.
> > At least for me, the other formatting is 100% unreadable.
>
> Any thoughts on just making it always print tha
On Tuesday 19 August 2008 12:40:11 Tom Lane wrote:
> I'd also like to propose making debug_pretty_print default to ON.
> At least for me, the other formatting is 100% unreadable.
>
Any thoughts on just making it always print that way and getting rid of the
GUC? Anyone want to argue they'll be tur
Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> what about changing (or adding) values "log" and "notice" ?
> debug_print_plan = log;
> debug_print_plan = notice;
> so you could set that on demand ?
Well, we could, but it would break existing habits for not much gain.
Really this proposal is to make d
On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 12:40 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Back in April we changed EXPLAIN VERBOSE to not dump the internal plan
> tree anymore, on the grounds that non-hackers didn't want that info and
> hackers could get it with debug_print_plan and related variables.
> Well, now that I've tried to do
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 06:33:33PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 12:40 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Back in April we changed EXPLAIN VERBOSE to not dump the internal plan
> > tree anymore, on the grounds that non-hackers didn't want that info and
> > hackers could get it with d
On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 12:40 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Back in April we changed EXPLAIN VERBOSE to not dump the internal plan
> tree anymore, on the grounds that non-hackers didn't want that info and
> hackers could get it with debug_print_plan and related variables.
> Well, now that I've tried to d
Back in April we changed EXPLAIN VERBOSE to not dump the internal plan
tree anymore, on the grounds that non-hackers didn't want that info and
hackers could get it with debug_print_plan and related variables.
Well, now that I've tried to do some planner development work relying on
debug_print_plan
