I'm going through the anonymous-code-blocks patch now. There are some
things missing, notably the ability to create a language with an
anonymous-code-block handler. The only way you can do it is to have
a pg_pltemplate entry, which is certainly not good enough for languages
not distributed with
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I'm going through the anonymous-code-blocks patch now. There are some
things missing, notably the ability to create a language with an
anonymous-code-block handler. The only way you can do it is to have
a pg_pltemplate
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 01:50:45PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I'm going through the anonymous-code-blocks patch now. There are
some things missing, notably the ability to create a language with
an anonymous-code-block
Tom Lane wrote:
I'm going through the anonymous-code-blocks patch now. There are some
things missing, notably the ability to create a language with an
anonymous-code-block handler. The only way you can do it is to have
a pg_pltemplate entry, which is certainly not good enough for languages
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
Should we consider another generic options syntax, while we're on a
roll? In the long run, that's the best way to avoid having a zillion
keywords.
If there were any near-term prospect of more options for languages,
I might agree ... but there isn't,
