On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 17:37, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 01/26/2011 11:26 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
For those of you using git, I wanted to point out that it is fairly easy
to remove git branches. For example, I can easily remove a branch on
my github repository using:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 17:37, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 01/26/2011 11:26 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
For those of you using git, I wanted to point out that it is fairly easy
to remove git branches.
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 17:37, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
I thought we had some hooks on gitmaster to help prevent accidents like
inadvertent branch deletion.
We have hooks to prevent a number of things, but not the removal of
On 01/27/2011 11:29 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Given that nobody is supposed to push temporary branches to the master
repo anyway, an intended branch removal should be a pretty darn rare
event. Now, our committers all seem to be pretty careful people, so
I don't feel strongly about having extra
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 17:36, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 01/27/2011 11:29 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Given that nobody is supposed to push temporary branches to the master
repo anyway, an intended branch removal should be a pretty darn rare
event. Now, our committers all seem
Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 17:36, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 01/27/2011 11:29 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Given that nobody is supposed to push temporary branches to the master
repo anyway, an intended branch removal should be a pretty darn rare
event.
On 27.01.2011 18:41, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Well, branch creation can always be undone --- branch removal seems like
the big problem because it can't.
Actually, all you need to do is to push the branch back to resurrect it.
As long as your local branch is up-to-date with what was removed (or
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Or for that we could just disable branch creation *completely*, and
then turn off that restriction that one time / year that we actually
create a branch?
Well, branch creation can always be undone --- branch removal seems
Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Or for that we could just disable branch creation *completely*, and
then turn off that restriction that one time / year that we actually
create a branch?
Well, branch creation can always be undone
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
On 01/27/2011 11:29 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Given that nobody is supposed to push temporary branches to the master
repo anyway, an intended branch removal should be a pretty darn rare
event.
Pushing a local topic branch by mistake seems much more likely
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
OK, someone removes a branch.
As was explained earlier on this thread, it's not gone at that
point; it's a dangling reference. I think that unless someone
explicitly prunes the dangling references, they are left around
for a week, and can easily be
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
On 01/27/2011 11:29 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Given that nobody is supposed to push temporary branches to the master
repo anyway, an intended branch removal should be a pretty darn rare
event.
Pushing a local topic branch by mistake
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Or for that we could just disable branch creation *completely*, and
then turn off that restriction that one time / year that we
Robert Haas wrote:
The master branch can be removed the same as any other one - just
substitute master in place of REL9_0_STABLE in the above commands.
But why would you do such a nutty thing? Worst case scenario looks to
me like you type the first of those commands and then go oh crud.
And
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 18:19, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Or for that we could just disable branch creation
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
So if someone does this (which does not look at all likely to me):
git push origin :REL9_0_STABLE
git branch -r -D origin/REL9_0_STABLE
git branch -d REL9_0_STABLE
...then, yes, they will need to find someone who has run 'git
pull' since the
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
So if someone does this (which does not look at all likely to me):
git push origin :REL9_0_STABLE
git branch -r -D origin/REL9_0_STABLE
git branch -d REL9_0_STABLE
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
The master branch can be removed the same as any other one - just
substitute master in place of REL9_0_STABLE in the above commands.
But why would you do such a nutty thing? Worst case scenario looks to
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 17:52, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Or for that we could just disable branch creation *completely*, and
then turn off that restriction that one time / year that we
and...@dunslane.net (Andrew Dunstan) writes:
On 01/27/2011 11:29 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Given that nobody is supposed to push temporary branches to the master
repo anyway, an intended branch removal should be a pretty darn rare
event. Now, our committers all seem to be pretty careful people, so
For those of you using git, I wanted to point out that it is fairly easy
to remove git branches. For example, I can easily remove a branch on
my github repository using:
$ git branch -d :branch_name
I don't believe that is revertable. What is scarey is that this could
be done on our
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:26:04AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
For those of you using git, I wanted to point out that it is fairly easy
to remove git branches. For example, I can easily remove a branch on
my github repository using:
$ git branch -d :branch_name
I don't believe that
On 01/26/2011 11:26 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
For those of you using git, I wanted to point out that it is fairly easy
to remove git branches. For example, I can easily remove a branch on
my github repository using:
$ git branch -d :branch_name
I don't believe that is revertable.
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:26:04AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
For those of you using git, I wanted to point out that it is fairly easy
to remove git branches. For example, I can easily remove a branch on
my github repository
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
For those of you using git, I wanted to point out that it is fairly easy
to remove git branches. For example, I can easily remove a branch on
my github repository using:
$ git branch -d :branch_name
I don't
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 01/26/2011 11:26 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
For those of you using git, I wanted to point out that it is fairly easy
to remove git branches. For example, I can easily remove a branch on
my github repository using:
$ git branch -d :branch_name
I don't
Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
For those of you using git, I wanted to point out that it is fairly easy
to remove git branches. ?For example, I can easily remove a branch on
my github repository using:
? ? ? ?$ git branch -d
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
For those of you using git, I wanted to point out that it is fairly easy
to remove git branches. ?For example, I can easily
Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
For those of you using git, I wanted to point out that it is fairly easy
to remove git branches. ?For
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
For those of you using git, I
30 matches
Mail list logo
