Andreas Karlsson wrote:
On 01/28/2014 10:56 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-01-28 21:48:09 +, Thom Brown wrote:
On 28 January 2014 21:37, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com
wrote:
The point of Andres's patch set
It seems to me that the terms physical, logical, and binary are
always relative to the perspective of the component being worked on.
Physical often means one level of abstraction below mine, and upon which
my work builds. Logical means my work's level of abstraction. And
Binary means data which
On 27 January 2014 16:20, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Hi,
Here's the next version of the patchset. The following changes have been
made:
* move xmin pegging and more logic responsibility to procarray.c
* split all support for changeset extraction from the initial slot patch
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 27 January 2014 16:20, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Hi,
Here's the next version of the patchset. The following changes have been
made:
* move xmin pegging and more logic responsibility to procarray.c
*
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I've rebased it here and am hacking on it still.
Andres and I are going back and forth between our respective git repos
hacking on this, and I think we're getting there, but I have a
terminological question which I'd like
On 28 January 2014 21:37, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I've rebased it here and am hacking on it still.
Andres and I are going back and forth between our respective git repos
hacking on this, and I think
On 2014-01-28 21:48:09 +, Thom Brown wrote:
On 28 January 2014 21:37, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I've rebased it here and am hacking on it still.
Andres and I are going back and forth between our
On 28 January 2014 21:56, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2014-01-28 21:48:09 +, Thom Brown wrote:
On 28 January 2014 21:37, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com
wrote:
I've rebased it here and am
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.comwrote:
On 2014-01-28 21:48:09 +, Thom Brown wrote:
On 28 January 2014 21:37, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com
wrote:
I've rebased it here
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 05:31:25PM -0500, Rod Taylor wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.comwrote:
On 2014-01-28 21:48:09 +, Thom Brown wrote:
On 28 January 2014 21:37, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:53 AM,
On 01/28/2014 10:56 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-01-28 21:48:09 +, Thom Brown wrote:
On 28 January 2014 21:37, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
The point of Andres's patch set is to introduce a new
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Andreas Karlsson andr...@proxel.se wrote:
I think physical and logical are fine and they seem to be well known
terminology. Oracle uses those words and I have also seen many places use
physical backup and logical backup, for example on Barman's homepage.
12 matches
Mail list logo
