At 2008-07-08 13:50:24 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can tell you from the perspective of CF coordinator, it's a PITA.
I felt so too at first, but I'm comfortable with it now.
Then I'm in awe of your wiki-editing skills. After keeping at it for a
few days, I've given up trying to do
On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 16:15 +0530, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
At 2008-07-08 13:50:24 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can tell you from the perspective of CF coordinator, it's a PITA.
I felt so too at first, but I'm comfortable with it now.
Then I'm in awe of your wiki-editing skills.
Robert Treat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Monday 07 July 2008 21:56:34 Bruce Momjian wrote:
Right now you advance the static link to the next commit fest once the
current one starts --- I was hoping for a link that advances when the
commit fest is done so I could make it a permanent tab in
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I surely do not have an objection to having a link defined as above ---
I just wanted to be clear on what we meant by current commitfest.
We probably need two separate terms for the place to submit new
patches and the place we
Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I surely do not have an objection to having a link defined as above ---
I just wanted to be clear on what we meant by current commitfest.
We probably need two separate terms for the place to
On Monday 07 July 2008 21:56:34 Bruce Momjian wrote:
Brendan Jurd wrote:
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a personal request, but I would like a permanent URL that points
to the in-progress commit page and is only changed when the commit fest
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Josh Berkus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
it concerns me that despite it being day 3 of the July commit fest,
people are still being advised to add new items to the wiki page.
To make the idea work, we need to stick to the rules we defined when
we
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 11:03 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
Brendan,
What I'm saying is, I've got the opportunity and the inclination to
make the wiki more usable. If you guys want better navigation,
there's a suggestion on the table to improve that. I'm not too
worried about the wiki
Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It would be very useful if people would add a comment like started my
review of X now. Otherwise people don't know whether the reviewer is
actually reviewing it at length, or just intend to at some point.
That's a good idea, imho, I'll try to do that
--
Brendan, all:
I mentioned to Alvaro over IM that I was thinking about adding a
navigation bar at the bottom of each commitfest. This would show,
e.g., for the current July commitfest:
Hmmm. I thought that commitfest-by-wiki was something that we were only
doing until we had the technical
Dave Page wrote:
it concerns me that despite it being day 3 of the July commit fest,
people are still being advised to add new items to the wiki page.
To make the idea work, we need to stick to the rules we defined when
we came up with the concept - specifically, no new patches once the
fest
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 3:33 AM, Josh Berkus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm. I thought that commitfest-by-wiki was something that we were only
doing until we had the technical requirements for tracking commitfests
nailed down, and then we were going to write a PHP app. No?
That sounds good to
Brendan,
What I'm saying is, I've got the opportunity and the inclination to
make the wiki more usable. If you guys want better navigation,
there's a suggestion on the table to improve that. I'm not too
worried about the wiki eventually being ditched for something better
-- in fact I'm
On 7/5/08, Robert Treat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think people are still working there way through the process, but it's
starting to sound like submitting a patch involves two steps from now on;
email to the list, and add your patch to the next commitfest page. Does that
sound right?
Jaime Casanova [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 7/5/08, Robert Treat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think people are still working there way through the process, but it's
starting to sound like submitting a patch involves two steps from now on;
email to the list, and add your patch to the next
Brendan Jurd wrote:
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a personal request, but I would like a permanent URL that points to
the in-progress commit page and is only changed when the commit fest of
_over_.
Well, most of the time there isn't any
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Treat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hmm, looks like some of the things I was thinking about have been added
recenelt... cool. One question I have still remains though, on the main
developer page
Dave Page wrote:
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Treat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hmm, looks like some of the things I was thinking about have been added
recenelt... cool. One question I have still remains though, on the main
developer page
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a personal request, but I would like a permanent URL that points to
the in-progress commit page and is only changed when the commit fest of
_over_.
Well, most of the time there isn't any commitfest in-progress at
On Thursday 03 July 2008 15:12:08 Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 20:06 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 8:02 PM, Marko Kreen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/3/08, Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it concerns me that despite it being day 3 of the July commit
On Thursday 03 July 2008 18:16:38 Dave Page wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 10:37 PM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Merlin Moncure [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are you suggesting that omission of a patch on the 'fest' page means
that you are bumped from the fest?
No, if you had submitted
On Saturday 05 July 2008 18:07:46 Robert Treat wrote:
On Thursday 03 July 2008 15:12:08 Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 20:06 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 8:02 PM, Marko Kreen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/3/08, Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it
Robert Treat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hmm, looks like some of the things I was thinking about have been added
recenelt... cool. One question I have still remains though, on the main
developer page (http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Development_information) it
has a link to the current
it concerns me that despite it being day 3 of the July commit fest,
people are still being advised to add new items to the wiki page.
To make the idea work, we need to stick to the rules we defined when
we came up with the concept - specifically, no new patches once the
fest begins!
So please -
On 7/3/08, Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it concerns me that despite it being day 3 of the July commit fest,
people are still being advised to add new items to the wiki page.
To make the idea work, we need to stick to the rules we defined when
we came up with the concept -
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 8:02 PM, Marko Kreen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/3/08, Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it concerns me that despite it being day 3 of the July commit fest,
people are still being advised to add new items to the wiki page.
To make the idea work, we need to stick to
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 20:06 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 8:02 PM, Marko Kreen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/3/08, Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it concerns me that despite it being day 3 of the July commit fest,
people are still being advised to add new items to
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it concerns me that despite it being day 3 of the July commit fest,
people are still being advised to add new items to the wiki page.
To make the idea work, we need to stick to the rules we defined when
we came up with the
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it concerns me that despite it being day 3 of the July commit fest,
people are still being advised to add new items to the wiki page.
To make the idea work, we need to stick to the rules we defined when
we came up with the
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Alex Hunsaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The one I advised be added (the Auto Explain patch) was posted on Mar
29, 2008 (http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-03/msg01214.php),
re-posted the Jun 30th and then an updated patch today... It only
being
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Alex Hunsaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The one I advised be added (the Auto Explain patch) was posted on Mar
29, 2008 (http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-03/msg01214.php),
Merlin Moncure [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are you suggesting that omission of a patch on the 'fest' page means
that you are bumped from the fest?
No, if you had submitted the patch on time then the correct next step
is to get it added to the fest page; I don't think that should be
controversial.
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 10:37 PM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Merlin Moncure [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are you suggesting that omission of a patch on the 'fest' page means
that you are bumped from the fest?
No, if you had submitted the patch on time then the correct next step
is to get
33 matches
Mail list logo
