Josh Berkus wrote:
Hackers,
At this point, almost all patches have been assigned to reviewers. If
you submitted a patch and don't get feedback by Saturday, take a look at
who's in the reviewers column and send them a query. Since I have no
way to track when patches are assigned to
Josh Berkus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also, note that the following patches need performance testing on a
variety of platforms. Everyone should help with this.
GSoC Improved Hash Indexing
posix fadvises
operator restrictivity function for text search
CLUSTER using sort instead of index
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 1:53 AM, Josh Berkus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some patches have not been assigned to reviewers for various reasons. The
following weren't assigned because they are complex and really need a
high-end hacker or committer to take them on:
libpq events
Alvaro actually
Merlin Moncure escribió:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 1:53 AM, Josh Berkus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some patches have not been assigned to reviewers for various reasons. The
following weren't assigned because they are complex and really need a
high-end hacker or committer to take them on:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Actually a minor gripe ... should PQsetvalue be PQsetValue? :-)
We were mimicing PQgetvalue, which uses a lowercase 'v'. Is there a
preference, none on this end.
--
Andrew Chernow
eSilo, LLC
every bit counts
http://www.esilo.com/
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Merlin Moncure escribió:
Alvaro actually performed a review on libpq events. We are waiting on
his feedback on our changes (based on his review) and the newly
submitted documentation. I'll update the wiki accordingly. I wasn't
sure if Alvaro was
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The patch looks OK to me as it was the last time I looked at it; maybe
Tom has more comments, so I decided against just committing it.
I haven't got round to looking at it in this fest. If anyone else wants
to look it over,
Josh is probably basing that on the long history of
discussion/revision cycles.
Yep, and that *I* don't understand what the patch does, so I'm not going to
turn a newbie reviewer loose on it.
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL
San Francisco
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
Josh Berkus wrote:
Josh is probably basing that on the long history of
discussion/revision cycles.
Yep, and that *I* don't understand what the patch does, so I'm not going to
turn a newbie reviewer loose on it.
Here is a quick overview, there are two parts to the patch:
1. event system
Hackers,
At this point, almost all patches have been assigned to reviewers. If
you submitted a patch and don't get feedback by Saturday, take a look at
who's in the reviewers column and send them a query. Since I have no
way to track when patches are assigned to reviewers, I have no idea if
10 matches
Mail list logo
