> Rod Taylor writes:
>
> > Anyone mind if we bump the DTD version to Docbook 4.2?
>
> Not sure if we should do this now. We're approaching the time where
> people should be writing documentation, not having to refiddle their
> carefully crafted DocBook installations. We're not going to realize
> > Yes, after updating docs to the newer DTD I intend to make them XML
> > compliant to ensure they work with v5 of docbook in the future.
>
> Ah, an XML vs. SGML debate. I look forward to it.
This one is pretty simple. It's been announced that the docbook group
isn't looking to continue wit
Rod Taylor writes:
> Anyone mind if we bump the DTD version to Docbook 4.2?
Not sure if we should do this now. We're approaching the time where
people should be writing documentation, not having to refiddle their
carefully crafted DocBook installations. We're not going to realize any
immediate
Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anyone mind if we bump the DTD version to Docbook 4.2?
Peter E. is the gatekeeper on that, I think --- he pushed us to 4.1
not long ago.
If Peter's okay with 4.2, then full speed ahead ...
regards, tom lane
PS: pgsql-docs is prob
Anyone mind if we bump the DTD version to Docbook 4.2?
This consists on all users who wish to build docs on installing the 4.2
DTD set, and updating some depreciated tags within the sgml files.
comment -> remark
docinfo -> appendixinfo, chapterinfo, bookinfo, etc.
What it buys is a number of u
