On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 15:07:06 +0100,
Florian G. Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
select * from t1, (delete from t2 returning t2.t1_id) where t1.id =
t2.t1_id limit 1 ;
I for my part couldn't even say what I'd expect that query to do.
I would expect it to delete all rows from t2 but
David Fetter wrote:
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 11:14:01PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Rusty Conover [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Or allow delete and update to be used in sub-queries?
That's been discussed but the implementation effort seems far from
trivial. One big problem is that a sub-query can
Hi,
I didn't see this on the TODO list, but if it is my apologies. Is it
in the cards to expand the functionality of DELETE/UPDATE returning
to be able to sort the output of the rows returned? Or allow delete
and update to be used in sub-queries?
Some examples:
create temp table t1
Rusty Conover [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I didn't see this on the TODO list, but if it is my apologies. Is it
in the cards to expand the functionality of DELETE/UPDATE returning
to be able to sort the output of the rows returned?
No.
Or allow delete
and update to be used in
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 11:14:01PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Rusty Conover [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I didn't see this on the TODO list, but if it is my apologies. Is
it in the cards to expand the functionality of DELETE/UPDATE
returning to be able to sort the output of the rows returned?
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 11:14:01PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Rusty Conover [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I didn't see this on the TODO list, but if it is my apologies. Is it
in the cards to expand the functionality of DELETE/UPDATE returning
to be able to sort the output of the rows returned?
Jim C. Nasby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 11:14:01PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Rusty Conover [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Or allow delete and update to be used in sub-queries?
That's been discussed but the implementation effort seems far from
trivial. One big problem is that
