Re: [HACKERS] Is ALTER TEXT SEARCH CONFIGURATION PARSER = new_parser really sane?

Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: After starting to document this stuff I'm wondering whether it really makes sense to change the parser associated with a tsearch configuration. The problem is that the new parser might have an unrelated set of token types, but we don't do anything about

[HACKERS] Is ALTER TEXT SEARCH CONFIGURATION PARSER = new_parser really sane?

After starting to document this stuff I'm wondering whether it really makes sense to change the parser associated with a tsearch configuration. The problem is that the new parser might have an unrelated set of token types, but we don't do anything about updating the configuration's mappings.

Re: [HACKERS] Is ALTER TEXT SEARCH CONFIGURATION PARSER = new_parser really sane?

Tom Lane wrote: After starting to document this stuff I'm wondering whether it really makes sense to change the parser associated with a tsearch configuration. The problem is that the new parser might have an unrelated set of token types, but we don't do anything about updating the

Re: [HACKERS] Is ALTER TEXT SEARCH CONFIGURATION PARSER = new_parser really sane?

On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, Tom Lane wrote: After starting to document this stuff I'm wondering whether it really makes sense to change the parser associated with a tsearch configuration. The problem is that the new parser might have an unrelated set of token types, but we don't do anything about