On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Haribabu Kommi
wrote:
> I marked this patch as ready for committer.
The patch says:
If a background worker registers to receive asynchronous notifications
with the LISTEN through SPI,
there is currently no way for incoming notifications
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 4:57 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Haribabu Kommi
> wrote:
>> I marked this patch as ready for committer.
>
> The patch says:
>
> If a background worker registers to receive asynchronous
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Haribabu Kommi
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 4:57 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Haribabu Kommi
> > wrote:
> >> I marked this patch as ready for committer.
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 11:46 PM, Thomas Munro
wrote:
>> Yes, the above description is good.
>
> +1
Committed that way, then.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Thomas Munro
wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Thomas Munro
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:30 PM, jacques klein
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I
On 2015-11-03 09:52:34 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 3 November 2015 at 09:35, Andres Freund wrote:
>
>
> > > With this commit - bde39eed0cafb82bc94c40e95d96b5cf47b6f719, it is not
> > possible
> > > to execute Notify commands inside a parallel worker. Can't we change
> > >
2015-11-03 9:54 GMT+01:00 Andres Freund :
> On 2015-11-03 09:52:26 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > 2015-11-03 9:35 GMT+01:00 Andres Freund :
> >
> > > On 2015-11-03 17:19:43 +1100, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
> > > > With this commit -
On 2015-11-03 09:52:26 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2015-11-03 9:35 GMT+01:00 Andres Freund :
>
> > On 2015-11-03 17:19:43 +1100, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
> > > With this commit - bde39eed0cafb82bc94c40e95d96b5cf47b6f719, it is not
> > possible
> > > to execute Notify commands
On 2015-11-03 17:19:43 +1100, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Thomas Munro
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Thomas Munro
> > wrote:
> > This made me wonder what happens if a background worker
2015-11-03 9:35 GMT+01:00 Andres Freund :
> On 2015-11-03 17:19:43 +1100, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Thomas Munro
> > wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Thomas Munro
> > >
On 3 November 2015 at 09:35, Andres Freund wrote:
> > With this commit - bde39eed0cafb82bc94c40e95d96b5cf47b6f719, it is not
> possible
> > to execute Notify commands inside a parallel worker. Can't we change
> > it as disable both listen and notify commands inside a
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Thomas Munro
wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Thomas Munro
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:30 PM, jacques klein
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I
Hello,
I added a NOFITY chan to the SQL arg of an SPI_execute(), (I did it
also with just the NOTIFY statement),
but the listeners (other workers) don't get the notification until a
NOTIFY chan is done for example with pgadmin,
They don't get lost, just not emited after the not forgotten call of
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Thomas Munro thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:30 PM, jacques klein
jacques.k...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello,
I added a NOFITY chan to the SQL arg of an SPI_execute(), (I did it
also with just the NOTIFY statement),
but the
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:30 PM, jacques klein jacques.k...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hello,
I added a NOFITY chan to the SQL arg of an SPI_execute(), (I did it also
with just the NOTIFY statement),
but the listeners (other workers) don't get the notification until a
NOTIFY chan is done for
15 matches
Mail list logo