Oleg Bartunov writes:
> attached patch introduces NULLs indexing for SP-GiST. With this patch
> Sp-GiST supports IS NULL, IS NOT NULL clauses, as well as full index scan.
I've looked at this patch a bit. I share Jaime's extreme discomfort
with re-using GIN code to handle some pages of an SPGist
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>> I guess the question is whether this is a stop-ship item for spgist.
>> If it is, then we're going to have to spend the time to fix this, but
>> if not, then since it was submitted more than two weeks after the
>> start of t
Robert Haas writes:
> I guess the question is whether this is a stop-ship item for spgist.
> If it is, then we're going to have to spend the time to fix this, but
> if not, then since it was submitted more than two weeks after the
> start of the CommitFest, it seems we should postpone it to 9.3.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
>> attached patch introduces NULLs indexing for SP-GiST. With this patch
>> Sp-GiST supports IS NULL, IS NOT NULL clauses, as well as full index scan.
>
> I was looking at this.
> It pass
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> attached patch introduces NULLs indexing for SP-GiST. With this patch
> Sp-GiST supports IS NULL, IS NOT NULL clauses, as well as full index scan.
>
I was looking at this.
It passes all regression tests, and seems to work fine.
Hi there,
attached patch introduces NULLs indexing for SP-GiST. With this patch
Sp-GiST supports IS NULL, IS NOT NULL clauses, as well as full index scan.
We added boolean satisfyAll field in spgInnerConsistentIn and spgLeafConsistentIn
structures, which informs the user-defined methods, that
