On 22 January 2012 05:30, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> The syntax for constants is sufficiently simple that I think that a
> good set of regression tests should make this entirely practicable,
> covering all permutations of relevant factors affecting how the
> implementation should act, including for
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Peter Geoghegan
> wrote:
>> So, having received feedback from Tom and others in relation to this
>> patch, I would like to state how I think I should go about addressing
>> various concerns to ensure that a re
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> So, having received feedback from Tom and others in relation to this
> patch, I would like to state how I think I should go about addressing
> various concerns to ensure that a revision of the patch gets into the
> 9.2 release. As I've sai
So, having received feedback from Tom and others in relation to this
patch, I would like to state how I think I should go about addressing
various concerns to ensure that a revision of the patch gets into the
9.2 release. As I've said time and again, I think that it is very
important that we have t
