On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> But if it annoys you, it seems OK to change it. Don't see a reason to
>> backpatch though?
>
> I think that It's worth backpatch to prevent users who observe the
> occurrence of the query conflicts carefully for testing 9.0 from
> getting co
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> This problem happens because ResolveRecoveryConflictWithVirtualXIDs
>> resets PS display for each read-only transactions that recovery
>> waits for. Why do we need to reset that each time even though
>> the conflict has not been resolved yet?
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 22:13 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> When I created the conflict between recovery and many read-only
> transactions in the standby server for test purpose, I found that the
> keyword "waiting" disappeared from PS display for just a moment
> even though the conflict had not been
Hi,
When I created the conflict between recovery and many read-only
transactions in the standby server for test purpose, I found that the
keyword "waiting" disappeared from PS display for just a moment
even though the conflict had not been resolved yet. This seems
strange to me.
This problem happ
