Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 7.3 announcement on postgresql.org

On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > > > > FYI, Vince, I started reading all my email (using elm) in a special 120 > > > column wide, 38 row xterm. There was just too much detail in thos

Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 7.3 announcement on postgresql.org

On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > FYI, Vince, I started reading all my email (using elm) in a special 120 > > column wide, 38 row xterm. There was just too much detail in those > > subjects i was missing. > > Doesn't do me much good

Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 7.3 announcement on postgresql.org

On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Has there been a release? It certainly hasn't been announced in the usual > > places that I monitor. > > Marc claimed he'd put out the announcement on pgsql-announce, but that > copy of the message never arriv

Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 7.3 announcement on postgresql.org

On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Neil Conway wrote: > > On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 23:32, Justin Clift wrote: > > > Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > > > > > Yes it would. But while on the subject, why did you only mention it's > > > > availability being on the advocacy site? > > > > > > *We* m

Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 7.3 announcement on postgresql.org

Neil Conway wrote: > On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 23:32, Justin Clift wrote: > > Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > > > Yes it would. But while on the subject, why did you only mention it's > > > availability being on the advocacy site? > > > > *We* mentioned it's availability being on the Advocacy site, bec

Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 7.3 announcement on postgresql.org

On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 23:32, Justin Clift wrote: > Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > Yes it would. But while on the subject, why did you only mention it's > > availability being on the advocacy site? > > *We* mentioned it's availability being on the Advocacy site, because it > gives people a single p

Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 7.3 announcement on postgresql.org

Vince Vielhaber wrote: > Yes it would. But while on the subject, why did you only mention it's > availability being on the advocacy site? *We* mentioned it's availability being on the Advocacy site, because it gives people a single place to go that has both PostgreSQL itself *and* a site that's

Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 7.3 announcement on postgresql.org

On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Justin Clift wrote: > Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > > On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > > > > FYI, Vince, I started reading all my email (using elm) in a special 120 > > > column wide, 38 row xterm. There was just too much detail in those > > > subjects i was

Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 7.3 announcement on postgresql.org

Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > FYI, Vince, I started reading all my email (using elm) in a special 120 > > column wide, 38 row xterm. There was just too much detail in those > > subjects i was missing. > > Doesn't do me much good if too often I do

Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 7.3 announcement on postgresql.org

On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > FYI, Vince, I started reading all my email (using elm) in a special 120 > column wide, 38 row xterm. There was just too much detail in those > subjects i was missing. Doesn't do me much good if too often I don't have the luxury of a large screen 'cuz

Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 7.3 announcement on postgresql.org

On 29 Nov 2002, Ryan Mahoney wrote: > Scroll down and read the rest of, it's an excellent announcement! If > the website and mirrors made mention of the release (as of 8:19PM CST > they don't!) and the message was sent to all the mailing lists, there > would probably be less confusion. When I re

Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 7.3 announcement on postgresql.org

FYI, Vince, I started reading all my email (using elm) in a special 120 column wide, 38 row xterm. There was just too much detail in those subjects i was missing. --- Vince Vielhaber wrote: > On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Christophe

Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 7.3 announcement on postgresql.org

> When I did find it, this is what I saw when I opened it: > - > > > For Immediate Release November 28th, 2002 > > Contacts: > Justin Clift > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > +61.3 9363 1313 (Australia) > >

Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 7.3 announcement on postgresql.org

On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > Glad you liked it. But that doesn't change the fact that it obscured the > > release to the point that many people didn't even know it was released. > > I found out by folks complaining about broken links. > > Hrm - the subject said it all,

Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 7.3 announcement on postgresql.org

> Glad you liked it. But that doesn't change the fact that it obscured the > release to the point that many people didn't even know it was released. > I found out by folks complaining about broken links. Hrm - the subject said it all, plus what about the first 2 paragraphs? " PostgreSQL Global D

Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 7.3 announcement on postgresql.org

On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > > Marc claimed he'd put out the announcement on pgsql-announce, but that > > > copy of the message never arrived here (it did show up on pgsql-general > > > though). Evidently you and Vince never got it either ... > > > > After alot of searc

Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 7.3 announcement on postgresql.org

> > Marc claimed he'd put out the announcement on pgsql-announce, but that > > copy of the message never arrived here (it did show up on pgsql-general > > though). Evidently you and Vince never got it either ... > > After alot of searching I did find it. It wasn't exactly what one would > expect

Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 7.3 announcement on postgresql.org

On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Has there been a release? It certainly hasn't been announced in the usual > > places that I monitor. > > Marc claimed he'd put out the announcement on pgsql-announce, but that > copy of the message never arriv

Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 7.3 announcement on postgresql.org

> Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Has there been a release? It certainly hasn't been announced in the usual > > places that I monitor. > > Marc claimed he'd put out the announcement on pgsql-announce, but that > copy of the message never arrived here (it did show up on pgsql-gener

Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 7.3 announcement on postgresql.org

Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Has there been a release? It certainly hasn't been announced in the usual > places that I monitor. Marc claimed he'd put out the announcement on pgsql-announce, but that copy of the message never arrived here (it did show up on pgsql-general though).

Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 7.3 announcement on postgresql.org

Christopher Kings-Lynne writes: > It has been announced on the announce mailing list and in the eweek > article... It's downloadable from the advocacy site... Yeah, that'll let the world know. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---(end of broadcast)--

Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 7.3 announcement on postgresql.org

- Original Message - From: "Peter Eisentraut" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 4:16 PM Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 7.3 announcement on postgresql.

Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 7.3 announcement on postgresql.org

Christopher Kings-Lynne writes: > There isn't one! Has there been a release? It certainly hasn't been announced in the usual places that I monitor. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our l

Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 7.3 announcement on postgresql.org

Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: There isn't one! Chris No kidding. I propose changes to the following pages: : Prominent mention of the latest stable and unstable releases (just stable now, of course). But since this seems to be kind of a repeat of the news pa

[HACKERS] Postgres 7.3 announcement on postgresql.org

There isn't one! Chris ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org