OK, patch attached that adds ORDER BY to the problem regression query.
---
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
That seems substantially the same plan as I see here. I guess
that the different output order must reflect a
regression test failure
OK, patch attached that adds ORDER BY to the problem regression query.
--
-
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
That seems substantially the same plan as I see here. I guess
that the different
Christopher Kings-Lynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
With the recent talk of RULE regression failures, I thought I'd bring back
up that I _always_ have a rule failure on Freebsd/alpha.
Hm, what do you get from
explain SELECT * FROM shoe_ready WHERE total_avail = 2;
in the regression
U...how do I make the regression database!? Do I have to do
installcheck instead of check?
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 30 August 2002 2:31 PM
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Cc: Hackers
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] RULE regression
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
U...how do I make the regression database!? Do I have to do
installcheck instead of check?
yes
Database is 'regression'
g
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe
Attached.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 30 August 2002 2:31 PM
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Cc: Hackers
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] RULE regression test failure
Christopher Kings-Lynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
With the recent
Christopher Kings-Lynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hm, what do you get from
explain SELECT * FROM shoe_ready WHERE total_avail = 2;
in the regression database?
[this plan]
That seems substantially the same plan as I see here. I guess
that the different output order must reflect a
That seems substantially the same plan as I see here. I guess
that the different output order must reflect a platform-specific
difference in qsort()'s treatment of equal keys.
Probably the best answer is to add ORDER BY shoename to the test
query to eliminate the platform dependency. Any
With the recent talk of RULE regression failures, I thought I'd bring back
up that I _always_ have a rule failure on Freebsd/alpha.
The files are attached...
Chris
regression.diffs
Description: Binary data
regression.out
Description: Binary data
---(end of
OK,
On HEAD, I am still seeing the attached failures. They didn't happen
before, but appeared in the last couple of months. All other tests pass.
It seems to just be a tuple ordering issue - I really don't know what caused
it? If necessary, I can just modify the expected result, but I
10 matches
Mail list logo
