Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Implement fastupdate support for GIN indexes, in which we try

2009-03-25 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes: 2009/3/24 Tom Lane t...@postgresql.org: catversion bumped because of change in GIN's pg_am entry, and because the format of GIN indexes changed on-disk (there's a metapage now, and possibly a pending list). Will this break

[HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Implement fastupdate support for GIN indexes, in which we try

2009-03-24 Thread Robert Haas
2009/3/24 Tom Lane t...@postgresql.org: Implement fastupdate support for GIN indexes, in which we try to accumulate multiple index entries in a holding area before adding them to the main index structure.  This helps because bulk insert is (usually) significantly faster than retail insert for

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Implement fastupdate support for GIN indexes, in which we try

2009-03-24 Thread Tom Lane
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes: 2009/3/24 Tom Lane t...@postgresql.org: catversion bumped because of change in GIN's pg_am entry, and because the format of GIN indexes changed on-disk (there's a metapage now, and possibly a pending list). Will this break pg_migrator? No worse than