Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
2009/3/24 Tom Lane t...@postgresql.org:
catversion bumped because of change in GIN's pg_am entry, and because
the format of GIN indexes changed on-disk (there's a metapage now,
and possibly a pending list).
Will this break
2009/3/24 Tom Lane t...@postgresql.org:
Implement fastupdate support for GIN indexes, in which we try to accumulate
multiple index entries in a holding area before adding them to the main index
structure. This helps because bulk insert is (usually) significantly faster
than retail insert for
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
2009/3/24 Tom Lane t...@postgresql.org:
catversion bumped because of change in GIN's pg_am entry, and because
the format of GIN indexes changed on-disk (there's a metapage now,
and possibly a pending list).
Will this break pg_migrator?
No worse than