On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 8:10 AM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of jue sep 29 02:11:52 -0300 2011:
> > Gurjeet Singh writes:
> > > I noticed that the savepointLevel member of TransactionStateData struct
> is
> > > initialized to 0 from TopTransactionStateData, and neve
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of jue sep 29 02:11:52 -0300 2011:
> Gurjeet Singh writes:
> > I noticed that the savepointLevel member of TransactionStateData struct is
> > initialized to 0 from TopTransactionStateData, and never incremented or
> > decremented afterwards.
>
> > Since this is a
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 1:11 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>> Gurjeet Singh writes:
>> > I noticed that the savepointLevel member of TransactionStateData struct
>> > is
>> > initialized to 0 from TopTransactionStateData, and never incremented or
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 1:11 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Gurjeet Singh writes:
> > I noticed that the savepointLevel member of TransactionStateData struct
> is
> > initialized to 0 from TopTransactionStateData, and never incremented or
> > decremented afterwards.
>
> > Since this is a file-local struc
Gurjeet Singh writes:
> I noticed that the savepointLevel member of TransactionStateData struct is
> initialized to 0 from TopTransactionStateData, and never incremented or
> decremented afterwards.
> Since this is a file-local struct I think we can simply get rid of all
> usages of this without
I noticed that the savepointLevel member of TransactionStateData struct is
initialized to 0 from TopTransactionStateData, and never incremented or
decremented afterwards.
Since this is a file-local struct I think we can simply get rid of all
usages of this without any risk. I visited all the commi
