On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Vaishnavi Prabakaran
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>>
>>
>> I’m not entirely sure why this was flagged as "Waiting for Author” by the
>> automatic run, the patch applies for me and builds so resetting back to
>> “Needs
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>
> I’m not entirely sure why this was flagged as "Waiting for Author” by the
> automatic run, the patch applies for me and builds so resetting back to
> “Needs
> review”.
>
>
This patch applies and build cleanly and I did a testing w
> On 30 May 2017, at 19:55, Peter Eisentraut
> wrote:
>
> On 5/29/17 22:56, Noah Misch wrote:
>> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 11:33:48AM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 5:31 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
Looks like a bug that we should fix in PG10, with backpatch to 9.4 (or
>
On 5/29/17 22:56, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 11:33:48AM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 5:31 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
>>> Looks like a bug that we should fix in PG10, with backpatch to 9.4 (or
>>> as far as it goes).
>>>
>>> Objections to commit?
>>>
>>
>> S
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 11:33:48AM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 5:31 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On 22 March 2017 at 02:50, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> >
> >> When using logical replication, I ran into a situation where the
> >> pg_stat_replication.state is not updated unti
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 5:31 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 22 March 2017 at 02:50, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>
>> When using logical replication, I ran into a situation where the
>> pg_stat_replication.state is not updated until any wal record is sent
>> after started up. For example, I set up logical
On 22 March 2017 at 02:50, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> When using logical replication, I ran into a situation where the
> pg_stat_replication.state is not updated until any wal record is sent
> after started up. For example, I set up logical replication with 2
> subscriber and restart the publisher
Hi all,
When using logical replication, I ran into a situation where the
pg_stat_replication.state is not updated until any wal record is sent
after started up. For example, I set up logical replication with 2
subscriber and restart the publisher server, but I see the following
status for a while
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 06:08:21PM -0700, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> clients. We have been very low-key (imho) in representing this solution
> to the developer community, but it should be considered for applications
> matching its capabilities.
I should like to emphasise that I have no desire to
Agreed. It would be nice to see both a single-master and multi-master
server included in our main tree and a clear description of when to use
each. The confusion over the various replication solutions and their
strengths/weaknesses is a major problem.
I always felt a clearer README for rserv w
...
> rserver only does single-master, while most people want multi-master.
As you probably know, rserv is not limited to only a single instance of
a single master. Many replication problems can be described as a "single
source" problem (or should be described as such; moving to a fully
distribut
Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 05:12:33PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Last I talked to Darren, the replication code was modified to merge into
> > our 7.2 tree. There are still pieces missing so it will not be
> > functional when applied. It is remotely possible there could
Karel Zak wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 11:40:20AM -0400, Michael Meskes wrote:
>
> > could anyone please enlighten me about the status of replication? I do
> > expect lots of questions about this, and I'm not really sure if I can
> > promise it for 7.3. :-)
>
> 8.0 ;-) (?)
>
> I add the o
On Tue, 28 May 2002, Michael Meskes wrote:
>
> This is about pgreplication I think. Is the the replication project of
> choice for pgsql? IIRC there quite some projects for this topic:
>
> PostgreSQL replicator
> Rserver
> Usogres
> dbbalancer
There's also DBMirror which I submitted to the co
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 09:53:53AM +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 11:40:20AM -0400, Michael Meskes wrote:
>
> > could anyone please enlighten me about the status of replication? I do
> > expect lots of questions about this, and I'm not really sure if I can
> > promise it for 7.
On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 11:40:20AM -0400, Michael Meskes wrote:
> could anyone please enlighten me about the status of replication? I do
> expect lots of questions about this, and I'm not really sure if I can
> promise it for 7.3. :-)
8.0 ;-) (?)
I add the other quesion: how is current status
On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 05:12:33PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Last I talked to Darren, the replication code was modified to merge into
> our 7.2 tree. There are still pieces missing so it will not be
> functional when applied. It is remotely possible there could be
> master-slave in 7.3, but
Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > could anyone please enlighten me about the status of replication? I do
> > expect lots of questions about this, and I'm not really sure if I can
> > promise it for 7.3. :-)
>
> Unless 7.3 slips drastically from our current intended
>
>
>
>Unless 7.3 slips drastically from our current intended schedule
>(beta in late August), I think it's pretty safe to say there will
>be no replication in 7.3, beyond what's already available (rserv
>and so forth).
>
I can't speak for any of the other replication projects, but
pgreplication
Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> could anyone please enlighten me about the status of replication? I do
> expect lots of questions about this, and I'm not really sure if I can
> promise it for 7.3. :-)
Unless 7.3 slips drastically from our current intended schedule
(beta in late Augus
Hi,
could anyone please enlighten me about the status of replication? I do
expect lots of questions about this, and I'm not really sure if I can
promise it for 7.3. :-)
Yes, I know it's marked urgent in the TODO list, but no one seems to be
listed as tackling this topic.
Thanks a lot.
Michael
Hi,
could anyone please enlighten me about the status of replication? I do
expect lots of questions about this, and I'm not really sure if I can
promise it for 7.3. :-)
Yes, I know it#s marked urgent in the TODO list, but no one seems to be
listed as tackling this topic.
Thanks a lot.
Michael
22 matches
Mail list logo
