Noah Misch wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 04:53:49PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
> > > > - Call VALGRIND_MAKE_MEM_NOACCESS() on a shared buffer when its local
> > > > pin
> > > > count falls to zero. Und
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 04:53:49PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
> > > - Call VALGRIND_MAKE_MEM_NOACCESS() on a shared buffer when its local
> > > pin
> > > count falls to zero. Under CLOBBER_FREED_MEMORY, wipe
Noah Misch wrote:
> - Add buildfarm members. This entails reporting any bugs that prevent an
> initial passing run. Once you have a passing run, schedule regular runs.
> Examples of useful additions:
> - "./configure ac_cv_func_getopt_long=no, ac_cv_func_snprintf=no ..." to
> enable al
Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
> > - Call VALGRIND_MAKE_MEM_NOACCESS() on a shared buffer when its local pin
> > count falls to zero. Under CLOBBER_FREED_MEMORY, wipe a shared buffer
> > when its global pin count falls to zero.
>
> Did a pat
On 2015-06-10 01:57:22 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> I think I agree with everything after your first sentence. I liked your
> specific proposal to split StartupXLOG(), but making broad-appeal
> restructuring proposals is hard. I doubt we would get good results by casting
> a wide net for restructur
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 04:18:37PM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2015-06-03 09:50:49 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> > Second, I would define the subject matter as "bug fixes, testing and
> > review", not "restructuring, testing and review." Different code
> > structures are clearest to different ha
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 07:48:36PM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2015-06-08 13:44:05 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I understand the overreaction/underreaction debate. Here were my goals
> > in this discussion:
> >
> > 1. stop worry about the 9.5 timeline so we could honestly assess our
> >
On 2015-06-08 13:44:05 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I understand the overreaction/underreaction debate. Here were my goals
> in this discussion:
>
> 1. stop worry about the 9.5 timeline so we could honestly assess our
> software - *done*
> 2. seriously address multi-xact issues without 9.5
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 03:58:05PM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 08:25:34AM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > This whole idea of "feature development" vs reliability is bogus. It
> > implies people that work on features don't care about reliability. Given
> > the fact that many of
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
> - Call VALGRIND_MAKE_MEM_NOACCESS() on a shared buffer when its local pin
> count falls to zero. Under CLOBBER_FREED_MEMORY, wipe a shared buffer
> when its global pin count falls to zero.
Did a patch for this ever materialize?
--
On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 4:58 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
> - Write, review and commit more automated test machinery to PostgreSQL. Test
> whatever excites you. If you need ideas, Craig posted some good ones
> upthread. Here are a few more:
> - Improve TAP suite (src/test/perl/TestLib.pm) logging
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 08:25:34AM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> This whole idea of "feature development" vs reliability is bogus. It
> implies people that work on features don't care about reliability. Given
> the fact that many of the features are actually about increasing database
> reliability in
On 3 June 2015 at 14:50, Noah Misch wrote:
> Subject changed from "Re: [CORE] postpone next week's release".
>
> On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 10:48:45PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Well, I think we stop what we are doing, focus on restructuring,
> > testing, and reviewing areas that historically h
On 06/03/2015 07:18 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2015-06-03 09:50:49 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
Second, I would define the subject matter as "bug fixes, testing and
review", not "restructuring, testing and review." Different code
structures are clearest to different hackers. Restructuring, on
av
On 2015-06-03 09:50:49 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> Second, I would define the subject matter as "bug fixes, testing and
> review", not "restructuring, testing and review." Different code
> structures are clearest to different hackers. Restructuring, on
> average, adds bugs even more quickly than f
On 3 June 2015 at 14:50, Noah Misch wrote:
> I
>
> would define the subject matter as "bug fixes, testing and review", not
> "restructuring, testing and review." Different code structures are
> clearest
> to different hackers. Restructuring, on average, adds bugs even more
> quickly
> than
Subject changed from "Re: [CORE] postpone next week's release".
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 10:48:45PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Well, I think we stop what we are doing, focus on restructuring,
> testing, and reviewing areas that historically have had problems, and
> when we are done, we can look
17 matches
Mail list logo
