Josh Berkus josh@agliodbs.com writes:
I propose a modest experiment: for the 8.3 development cycle, let's try
to agree (in the next month or so) on a roadmap of what major features
should be in 8.3 and who will make each one happen.
Well, I think the what is more important that the who -- we
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
we will know whether this is a great thing we should continue, or we
should stick to our traditional laissez-faire style of project
management. I figure that even if it really sucks, it wouldn't kill us
to try it for one release cycle --- at the very worst, we'd make up
[ hijacking this thread over to where the developers hang out ]
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
It's pointless to suppose that individual developers would really be
answerable to any project-wide management, since that's not who they're
paid by. So I tend to think
On Aug 31, 2006, at 8:47 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
[ hijacking this thread over to where the developers hang out ]
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
It's pointless to suppose that individual developers would really be
answerable to any project-wide management, since that's
we will know whether this is a great thing we should continue, or we
should stick to our traditional laissez-faire style of project
management. I figure that even if it really sucks, it wouldn't kill us
to try it for one release cycle --- at the very worst, we'd make up lost
time in future by no
Tom,
I propose a modest experiment: for the 8.3 development cycle, let's try
to agree (in the next month or so) on a roadmap of what major features
should be in 8.3 and who will make each one happen.
Well, I think the what is more important that the who -- we can switch whos
if that's what
