Hello.
I'm just curious as to the 7.3 status of a couple of things:
1. Back in Feb. I wrote (in regards to Oracle behavior):
Unlike normal queries where blocks are added to the MRU end of
an LRU list, full table scans add the blocks to the LRU end of
the LRU list. I was wondering, in the
Mike Mascari [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bruce wrote:
Yes, someone from India has a project to test LRU-K and MRU for
large table scans and report back the results. He will
implement whichever is best.
Did this make it into 7.3?
No, we never heard back from that guy. It is still a live
Mike Mascari wrote:
Hello.
I'm just curious as to the 7.3 status of a couple of things:
1. Back in Feb. I wrote (in regards to Oracle behavior):
Unlike normal queries where blocks are added to the MRU end of
an LRU list, full table scans add the blocks to the LRU end of
the LRU
Tom Lane wrote:
Another thing I'd like to see in the near future is a configurable
setting for the amount of memory space that can be used for temp-table
buffers. The current setting is ridiculously small (64*8K IIRC), but
there's not much point in increasing it until we also have a smarter
Tom Lane wrote:
Mike Mascari [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bruce wrote:
Yes, someone from India has a project to test LRU-K and MRU for
large table scans and report back the results. He will
implement whichever is best.
Did this make it into 7.3?
No, we never heard back from that
Tom Lane wrote:
Mike Mascari [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bruce wrote:
Yes, someone from India has a project to test LRU-K and MRU for
large table scans and report back the results. He will
implement whichever is best.
Did this make it into 7.3?
No, we never heard back from that guy. It is
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What do we do now? The author clearly got it in before beta, but we are
in beta now. I think we should apply it.
No. It's a feature addition and we are in feature freeze. Moreover,
it's an unreviewed feature addition (I certainly never had time to
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No, we never heard back from that guy. It is still a live topic though.
One of the Red Hat people was looking at it over the summer, and I think
Neil Conway is experimenting with LRU-2 code right now.
Just to confirm that, I'm working on this, and hope to
OK, I will save this for 7.4. Sorry, Gavin. I missed this one for 7.3.
---
pgman wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Mike Mascari [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bruce wrote:
Yes, someone from India has a project to test LRU-K and
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
OK, I will save this for 7.4. Sorry, Gavin. I missed this one for 7.3.
Such is life.
Gavin
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
10 matches
Mail list logo
