On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Simon Riggs writes:
>>> I hear that CF manager is a difficult role for a single individual.
>>> So it makes sense to split that role between multiple people.
>>
>>> I volunteer to be the CF
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs writes:
>> I hear that CF manager is a difficult role for a single individual.
>> So it makes sense to split that role between multiple people.
>
>> I volunteer to be the CF manager for Replication, and also for
>> Performance. ...
>>
Simon Riggs writes:
> I hear that CF manager is a difficult role for a single individual.
> So it makes sense to split that role between multiple people.
> I volunteer to be the CF manager for Replication, and also for
> Performance. ...
> Patches need an eventual committer anyway, so this is a r
* Simon Riggs (si...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
> So it makes sense to split that role between multiple people.
I agree that it'd be good to have multiple people supporting the CF.
I've been considering volunteering to be part of such a group for a
given CF.
> I volunteer to be the CF manager for Re
I hear that CF manager is a difficult role for a single individual.
So it makes sense to split that role between multiple people.
I volunteer to be the CF manager for Replication, and also for
Performance. I have an interest in and long experience in each of
those areas, so that makes sense for m
