Am Mittwoch, 23. April 2008 schrieb Andrew Dunstan:
> No, I mean you could put it in your psql prompt.
>
> 8.3 dbname>
You can put variables in your prompt. The VERSION variable exists, but it is
a bit verbose. Perhaps it can be trimmed.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@p
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 09:24:42 -0700
> "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > O.k. here is version 3 of the patch.
> >
> > It is the same patch except that on standard connect it emits the
> > client version. It does not emit the server version u
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:54:45 -0400
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Right. I suggest you open the file in "meld" which allows you to
> easily remove the offending extraneous difference. Of course, you
> can do it in Vim or Emacs directly, but I don't think Joe can do
> anything of th
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:44:43 -0400
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> Ahh o.k. Now I have a complaint. :) I happily removed the whitespace
> where I saw this, "%s \n" (for example) but the whitespace above is for
> readability. Co
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:44:43 -0400
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> > ! puts(_("\n"));
> > ! puts(_("You are using psql, the
> > command-line interface to PostgreSQL.\n")); !
> > puts(_("\tFor SQL help t
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> ! puts(_("\n"));
> ! puts(_("You are using psql, the command-line interface
> to PostgreSQL.\n"));
> ! puts(_("\tFor SQL help type \\h or \\help ."));
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:22:10 -0400
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:48:24 -0700
> > "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > O.k. I *think* this should do it.
>
> Whitespace still broken
Well maybe if we just declared that
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:48:24 -0700
> "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> O.k. I *think* this should do it.
Whitespace still broken
--
Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom De
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:48:24 -0700
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
O.k. I *think* this should do it.
Added word Some
Version shows up no matter what
Server version shows up only if:
major or minor version doesn't match (same same as previous behavior)
Joshua D. Drake
--
The Postg
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:28:04 -
"Greg Sabino Mullane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
>
> > WARNING: Server version 8.2, psql version 8.4.
> > psql features may not work.
>
> Can we say "Some psql features..."? the lowercase looks odd.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
> WARNING: Server version 8.2, psql version 8.4.
> psql features may not work.
Can we say "Some psql features..."? the lowercase looks odd.
> I left off server version because there doesn't seem to be a
> reason to have it except if the server
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:38:22 -0400
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> > O.k. here is version 3 of the patch.
> >
> > It is the same patch except that on standard connect it emits the
> > client version. It does not emit the server version unless their is
> > a
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> O.k. here is version 3 of the patch.
>
> It is the same patch except that on standard connect it emits the
> client version. It does not emit the server version unless their is a
> mismatch. Does that make sense?
But you didn't fix any of the whitespace issues I mentione
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 09:24:42 -0700
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> O.k. here is version 3 of the patch.
>
> It is the same patch except that on standard connect it emits the
> client version. It does not emit the server version unless their is a
> mismatch. Does that ma
Hello,
O.k. here is version 3 of the patch.
It is the same patch except that on standard connect it emits the
client version. It does not emit the server version unless their is a
mismatch. Does that make sense?
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.comm
> > > * If there is not a version mismatch, psql tells you nothing but
> > > ask for help if you need it.
> >
> > That was NOT part of the agreement. The version line should stay.
>
> Why do we care, if the version matches? Not that I am feeling like
> fighting about it but it seems just a wa
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:47:32 +1000
"Brendan Jurd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > Sure. What did you think about Andrew's suggestion?
>
> I think it's cool; allowing the version to be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Sure. What did you think about Andrew's suggestion?
I think it's cool; allowing the version to be added to a custom psql
prompt is a nice feature, regardless of how we go with the banner.
I'
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:25:19 +1000
"Brendan Jurd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With your proposal, when the banner goes silent about the version, I
> need to think "Oh yeah, that means that the server version is the same
> as the psql version. Umm, what version of psql did I execute again?"
> Be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:07:46 +1000
> "Brendan Jurd" wrote:
> > In such an environment, it's *very* useful to have instant feedback on
> > which server I've just connected to with psql.
>
>
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 20:09:44 -0400
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> No, I mean you could put it in your psql prompt.
>
> 8.3 dbname>
Oh that's interesting. Let me see how it looks.
Joshua D. Drake
--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreS
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:07:46 +1000
"Brendan Jurd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > Why do we care, if the version matches? Not that I am feeling like
> > fighting about it but it seems j
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 19:56:53 -0400
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You might care if you are working with more than one version at once,
even if the psql you're using matches the server it's talking to.
(That's kinda why I suggested the version as a pos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Why do we care, if the version matches? Not that I am feeling like
> fighting about it but it seems just a waste of bytes. It makes sense if
> the version doesn't match.
>
To take a field e
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 19:56:53 -0400
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You might care if you are working with more than one version at once,
> even if the psql you're using matches the server it's talking to.
> (That's kinda why I suggested the version as a possible prompt escape)
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 19:13:54 -0400
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
* If there is not a version mismatch, psql tells you nothing but
ask for help if you need it.
That was NOT part of the agreement. The
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:28:20 -0700
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why do we care, if the version matches? Not that I am feeling like
> fighting about it but it seems just a waste of bytes. It makes sense
> if the version doesn't match.
>
> Joshua D. Drake
Actually in thinking abo
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 19:13:54 -0400
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > * If there is not a version mismatch, psql tells you nothing but
> > ask for help if you need it.
>
> That was NOT part of the agreement. The version line should stay.
Why
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * If there is not a version mismatch, psql tells you nothing but ask
> for help if you need it.
That was NOT part of the agreement. The version line should stay.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (p
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:56:49 -0400
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I think the warning should be two lines:
> >
> > WARNING: Server is version %d.%d, %s is version %d.%d.
> > Some backslash commands may not work.
>
> I tried that, I thought it looked we
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:56:49 -0400
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ! puts(_("\tTo view the copyright type
> > \\c . \n"));
>
> The copyright is show with \copyright, not \c.
Doh! I knew that. I will fix after the below discussion :)
>
> I think the warning shoul
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Attached is v2 of this patch. The following changes have been made:
>
> * If there is not a version mismatch, psql tells you nothing but ask
> for help if you need it.
> * If there is a version mismatch it tells you and still tells you to
> type help if you need it
Tha
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:17:40 -0700
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
Attached is v2 of this patch. The following changes have been made:
* If there is not a version mismatch, psql tells you nothing but ask
for help if you need it.
* If there is a version mismatch it tells you
Hello,
Attached is a patch for the default message from psql. Couple of things
of note:
1. I removed the force wrapping, instead allowing the terminal to do
it. This seems to work in X and well as on the console. I am not sure
if I like this or not and am not opposed to changing to a forced wrap.
34 matches
Mail list logo
