On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Dickson S. Guedeslis...@guedesoft.net wrote:
I think there is enough support for the patch. So please adjust it to
report the server version correctly.
Thanks Peter, I'll adjust the patch and post a new version ASAP.
As this patch was reviewed over a week ago
On Friday 17 July 2009 23:24:16 Dickson S. Guedes wrote:
An use case that i can figure out is an user that connects in multiples
instances in a lot of remote sites (like home-officer for example) and
needs this information in the prompt to don't lost the context of your
work. Is this valid? Is
Em Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:52:48 -0300, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net
escreveu:
On Friday 17 July 2009 23:24:16 Dickson S. Guedes wrote:
An use case that i can figure out is an user that connects in multiples
instances in a lot of remote sites (like home-officer for example) and
needs this
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Dimitri Fontainedfonta...@hi-media.com wrote:
Le 17 juil. 09 à 23:24, Tom Lane a écrit :
It seems unlikely that the DB version number would be worth the prompt
space. In situations like that you'd much more likely need identifying
info like the DB hostname
Hi,
Le 17 juil. 09 à 23:24, Tom Lane a écrit :
It seems unlikely that the DB version number would be worth the prompt
space. In situations like that you'd much more likely need
identifying
info like the DB hostname and port number.
At work we have a fair number of database servers, some
Em Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:40:45 -0300, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net
escreveu:
On Thursday 07 May 2009 05:23:41 Dickson S. Guedes wrote:
This is a WIP patch (for the TODO item in the subject) that I'm putting
in the Commit Fest queue for 8.5.
More generally, does anyone actually need this
Dickson S. Guedes lis...@guedesoft.net writes:
Em Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:40:45 -0300, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net
escreveu:
More generally, does anyone actually need this feature? psql complains
loudly enough if the version numbers are not the right ones. I don't
know why this would
On Thursday 07 May 2009 05:23:41 Dickson S. Guedes wrote:
This is a WIP patch (for the TODO item in the subject) that I'm putting
in the Commit Fest queue for 8.5.
The problem I'm seeing with this is that currently it resolves
%v (client) = 8.5devel
%V (server) = 8.5.0
Besides being
2009/5/7 Dickson S. Guedes lis...@guedesoft.net:
Em Qui, 2009-05-07 às 10:11 +0300, Peter Eisentraut escreveu:
On Thursday 07 May 2009 05:23:41 Dickson S. Guedes wrote:
This is a WIP patch (for the TODO item in the subject) that I'm putting
in the Commit Fest queue for 8.5.
How about you
On Tuesday 14 July 2009 09:12:21 Jaime Casanova wrote:
2009/5/7 Dickson S. Guedes lis...@guedesoft.net:
Em Qui, 2009-05-07 às 10:11 +0300, Peter Eisentraut escreveu:
On Thursday 07 May 2009 05:23:41 Dickson S. Guedes wrote:
This is a WIP patch (for the TODO item in the subject) that I'm
On Thursday 07 May 2009 05:23:41 Dickson S. Guedes wrote:
This is a WIP patch (for the TODO item in the subject) that I'm putting
in the Commit Fest queue for 8.5.
How about you just put the values in a variable and use the existing facility
to put those variables in the prompt?
--
Sent via
Em Qui, 2009-05-07 às 10:11 +0300, Peter Eisentraut escreveu:
On Thursday 07 May 2009 05:23:41 Dickson S. Guedes wrote:
This is a WIP patch (for the TODO item in the subject) that I'm putting
in the Commit Fest queue for 8.5.
How about you just put the values in a variable and use the
This is a WIP patch (for the TODO item in the subject) that I'm putting
in the Commit Fest queue for 8.5.
regards...
--
Dickson S. Guedes
mail/xmpp: gue...@guedesoft.net - skype: guediz
http://guedesoft.net - http://www.postgresql.org.br
psql_escape_client_server_version.patch.bz2
13 matches
Mail list logo
