On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Masahiko Sawada
> wrote:
>> While reading source codes I found the following comment in xlog.c.
>>
>> /*
>> * Have we passed our safe starting point? Note that minRecoveryPoint is
>> * known to be inco
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> While reading source codes I found the following comment in xlog.c.
>
> /*
> * Have we passed our safe starting point? Note that minRecoveryPoint is
> * known to be incorrectly set if ControlFile->backupEndRequired, until
> * the XLOG_B
Hi,
While reading source codes I found the following comment in xlog.c.
/*
* Have we passed our safe starting point? Note that minRecoveryPoint is
* known to be incorrectly set if ControlFile->backupEndRequired, until
* the XLOG_BACKUP_RECORD arrives to advise us of the correct
* minRecoveryP