-Original Message-
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:11 PM
To: Steve Novick
Cc: PostgreSQL-development; PostgreSQL Win32 port list
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 native port
Below is the email that prompted me to add the derived files
Below is the email that prompted me to add the derived files to
WIN32_DEV CVS.
However, most people don't want them in there, so I have removed them,
and updated the web page to recommend the nightly snapshots (which have
the derived files), and mentioned the tools that will be needed
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 08:57:16AM -0400, Merlin Moncure wrote:
Here: http://unxutils.sourceforge.net/ are ports of several unix
utility programs (including bison and flex) for win32. From my
experiences compiling the Peer Direct port, this is the easiest way to
get started.
OK, I'll throw
port list
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 native port
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Bruce Momjian writes:
As you can see from the new Compiling web page, I just normally
compile under Unix, distclean, then Win32 compile via Samba.
That isn't very efficient unless you have two machines
On Thursday 04 September 2003 09:22, Joerg Hessdoerfer wrote:
Hi!
Thanks to all who have replied (privately or via the list), it seems
sometimes it's just necessary to be a bit insistant!
That said, I'm positively surprised by what has been done already
(especially Bruce and Marc, this is
On Thursday 04 September 2003 19:20, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Joerg Hessdoerfer writes:
I'm currently in the process of setting up my development environment
(how the heck do I get bison/flex to compile under MingW/MSYS? Oh my...),
Use the Cygwin tools.
There is no need for that, MinGW has
Hi!
Thanks to all who have replied (privately or via the list), it seems sometimes
it's just necessary to be a bit insistant!
That said, I'm positively surprised by what has been done already (especially
Bruce and Marc, this is really a GoodThing to have the web page and the
list).
I'm
Joerg Hessdoerfer kirjutas N, 04.09.2003 kell 10:22:
I'm currently in the process of setting up my development environment (how the
heck do I get bison/flex to compile under MingW/MSYS? Oh my...)
there is a precompiled bison in the MinGW filelist
http://www.mingw.org/download.shtml#hdr2
dunno
Joerg Hessdoerfer wrote:
Hi!
Thanks to all who have replied (privately or via the list), it seems sometimes
it's just necessary to be a bit insistant!
That said, I'm positively surprised by what has been done already (especially
Bruce and Marc, this is really a GoodThing to have the web
Joerg Hessdoerfer writes:
I'm currently in the process of setting up my development environment (how the
heck do I get bison/flex to compile under MingW/MSYS? Oh my...),
Use the Cygwin tools.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of
Cygwin requires a license for commercial use.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 10:20 AM
To: Joerg Hessdoerfer
Cc: Bruce Momjian; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 native port
Joerg Hessdoerfer
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Joerg Hessdoerfer wrote:
Hi!
Thanks to all who have replied (privately or via the list), it seems sometimes
it's just necessary to be a bit insistant!
That said, I'm positively surprised by what has been done already (especially
Bruce and Marc, this is
Doug McNaught wrote:
Dann Corbit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Cygwin requires a license for commercial use.
Use in the sense of distributing applications linked against it,
yes.
In this case I don't think it's a problem. The output of 'flex' and
'bison' is not required to be GPL (there
Dann Corbit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Cygwin requires a license for commercial use.
Use in the sense of distributing applications linked against it,
yes.
In this case I don't think it's a problem. The output of 'flex' and
'bison' is not required to be GPL (there is a specific exception in
the
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Dann Corbit wrote:
Use the Cygwin tools.
Cygwin requires a license for commercial use.
It does? I don't see it:
http://cygwin.com/licensing.html
Jon
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
, 2003 11:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 native port
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Dann Corbit wrote:
Use the Cygwin tools.
Cygwin requires a license for commercial use.
It does? I don't see it:
http://cygwin.com/licensing.html
Jon
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Dann Corbit wrote:
Did you read this:
This means that unless you modify the tools so that compiled
executables do not make use of the Cygwin library, your compiled
programs will also have to be free software distributed under the GPL
with source code available to all.
I
Bruce Momjian writes:
As you can see from the new Compiling web page, I just normally
compile under Unix, distclean, then Win32 compile via Samba.
That isn't very efficient unless you have two machines or use something
like vmware.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 12:27:58PM -0700, Dann Corbit wrote:
Did you read this:
This means that unless you modify the tools so that compiled
executables do not make use of the Cygwin library, your compiled
programs will also have to be free software distributed under the GPL
with source code
-Original Message-
From: Jon Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 4:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 native port
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Dann Corbit wrote:
Did you read this:
This means that unless you modify the tools so
-Original Message-
From: Jon Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 1:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 native port
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Dann Corbit wrote:
Did you read this:
This means that unless you modify the tools so
Dann Corbit wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jon Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 1:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 native port
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Dann Corbit wrote:
Did you read this:
This means that unless you modify
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 2:35 PM
To: Postgresql Hackers
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 native port
Dann Corbit wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jon Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Bruce Momjian writes:
As you can see from the new Compiling web page, I just normally
compile under Unix, distclean, then Win32 compile via Samba.
That isn't very efficient unless you have two machines or use something
like vmware.
One quick solution would be to
Dann Corbit wrote:
You are making an assumption that the follwing sentence is only valid
under conditions of the first. That is nowhere stated. That connection
is only implied by your interpretation.
Not at all. the phrase This means clearly refers to what went before.
Even a trivial and
-Original Message-
From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 6:13 PM
To: Joerg Hessdoerfer; Alexander Schulz; Hannu Krosing
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 native port
First, there was a branch created a couple of weeks ago
Does anybody know of a BSD licensed signal implementation that
compiles on win32?
See how Apache handles this problem (via APR?).
-sc
--
Sean Chittenden
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dann Corbit wrote:
I sent signal code to Bruce Momjian that can be freely used in the
project. It compiles on Win32 and has been contributed as BSD license.
The architecture is a bit different from what had already been
accomplished, so I don't know how hard it will be to splice it in.
I
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
So far as I'm aware Joerg, we didn't have enough time to get all the Win32
stuff done for 7.4, and it was felt (rightly so) that it wasn't worth
holding off on 7.4 to get it in.
At the moment, the main developers are doing nothing but fixing bugs in 7.4
as we
Hi!
After holding my breath for quite a while, it bursts out... I'd really like to
get a status update on said port.
The reason is, it's seemingly put on hold for me. After this port was talked
over on the list, there seemed to be an explosion of effort, with initial
success stories. I did
: Dienstag, 2. September 2003 12:31
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: [HACKERS] Win32 native port
Hi!
After holding my breath for quite a while, it bursts out... I'd really
like to
get a status update on said port.
The reason is, it's seemingly put on hold for me. After this port was
talked
over
Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Joerg
Hessdoerfer
Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. September 2003 12:31
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: [HACKERS] Win32 native port
Hi!
After holding my breath for quite a while, it bursts out... I'd really
like to
get a status
-Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Im Auftrag von Joerg
Hessdoerfer
Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. September 2003 12:31
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: [HACKERS] Win32 native port
Hi!
After holding my breath for quite a while, it bursts out... I'd really
l
So far as I'm aware Joerg, we didn't have enough time to get all the Win32
stuff done for 7.4, and it was felt (rightly so) that it wasn't worth
holding off on 7.4 to get it in.
At the moment, the main developers are doing nothing but fixing bugs in 7.4
as we are now in feature freeze.
Once 7.4
Thank you, Bruce for info.
Best regards
Rony
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ronald Kuczek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 3:34 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 native port
I will start working on it next week
Hi all,
Can someone tell me what happened with Win32 native port ?
Discussion bevore beginning of 7.4, TODO entry this time as urgent,
but without dash. What does it mean - comes native port with 7.4 or it
doesn't ? Thanks for any information.
Best regards
Rony
---(end
36 matches
Mail list logo
