On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Hitoshi Harada wrote:
> 2010/8/17 Robert Haas :
>> On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 7:44 AM, Hitoshi Harada wrote:
>>> We (Marko, David Fetter and I) discussed on IRC about design of
>>> writeable CTEs. It does and will contain not only syntax but also
>>> miscellaneous s
On 2010-08-17 6:41 AM +0300, Hitoshi Harada wrote:
2010/8/17 Robert Haas:
There are really two separate features here, and it might be worth
giving them separate names and separate designs (and separate
patches). Allowing the main query to be an insert, update, or delete
seems easier than allow
2010/8/17 Robert Haas :
> On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 7:44 AM, Hitoshi Harada wrote:
>> We (Marko, David Fetter and I) discussed on IRC about design of
>> writeable CTEs. It does and will contain not only syntax but also
>> miscellaneous specifications, general rules and restrictions. I hope
>> this w
2010/8/17 David Fetter :
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 04:34:07PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 3:00 PM, David Fetter wrote:
>> >> There has been previous talk of allowing WITH (COPY ...) and I am
>> >> personally of the opinion that it would be nice to be able to do
>> >> WITH
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 5:08 PM, David Fetter wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 04:34:07PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 3:00 PM, David Fetter wrote:
>> >> There has been previous talk of allowing WITH (COPY ...) and I am
>> >> personally of the opinion that it would be nice
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 04:34:07PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 3:00 PM, David Fetter wrote:
> >> There has been previous talk of allowing WITH (COPY ...) and I am
> >> personally of the opinion that it would be nice to be able to do
> >> WITH (EXPLAIN ...). DDL seems like
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 3:00 PM, David Fetter wrote:
>> There has been previous talk of allowing WITH (COPY ...) and I am
>> personally of the opinion that it would be nice to be able to do
>> WITH (EXPLAIN ...). DDL seems like a poor idea.
>
> It may be, but I can see use cases for partitioning.
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 02:25:50PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 7:44 AM, Hitoshi Harada wrote:
> > We (Marko, David Fetter and I) discussed on IRC about design of
> > writeable CTEs. It does and will contain not only syntax but also
> > miscellaneous specifications, general
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 7:44 AM, Hitoshi Harada wrote:
> We (Marko, David Fetter and I) discussed on IRC about design of
> writeable CTEs. It does and will contain not only syntax but also
> miscellaneous specifications, general rules and restrictions. I hope
> this will help the patch reviews and
We (Marko, David Fetter and I) discussed on IRC about design of
writeable CTEs. It does and will contain not only syntax but also
miscellaneous specifications, general rules and restrictions. I hope
this will help the patch reviews and stop dangerous design at the
early stage. If you find something
10 matches
Mail list logo