Re: [HACKERS] assignment type mismatch complaints

2002-10-27 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Sat, 2002-10-26 at 18:34, Larry Rosenman wrote: > On Sat, 2002-10-26 at 18:27, Tom Lane wrote: > > Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > How concerned are we about assignment type mismatch warnings? > > > > They're probably all "char versus unsigned char" complaints? > Probably. Th

Re: [HACKERS] assignment type mismatch complaints

2002-10-26 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Sat, 2002-10-26 at 18:27, Tom Lane wrote: > Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > How concerned are we about assignment type mismatch warnings? > > They're probably all "char versus unsigned char" complaints? Probably. The first few I looked at are PG_GETARG_CSTRING to unsigned char

Re: [HACKERS] assignment type mismatch complaints

2002-10-26 Thread Tom Lane
Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How concerned are we about assignment type mismatch warnings? They're probably all "char versus unsigned char" complaints? There are a ton of them on compilers that care about it; most of 'em in the multibyte support. While it would be nice to clean

Re: [HACKERS] assignment type mismatch complaints

2002-10-26 Thread Bruce Momjian
Can you send over a list of the errors and we will check them out. --- Larry Rosenman wrote: > How concerned are we about assignment type mismatch warnings? > > I got a bunch in the mb stuff, and some in other places from

[HACKERS] assignment type mismatch complaints

2002-10-26 Thread Larry Rosenman
How concerned are we about assignment type mismatch warnings? I got a bunch in the mb stuff, and some in other places from the UnixWare 7.1.3 compiler. We still pass all regression tests. LER -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812