Re: [HACKERS] broken locale in 7.0.2 without multibyte support (FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE) ?

2000-12-04 Thread Oleg Bartunov
On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Tom Lane wrote: Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2000 18:13:47 -0500 From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Oleg Bartunov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] broken locale in 7.0.2 without multibyte support (FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE) ? Oleg Bartunov [EMAIL

Re: [HACKERS] broken locale in 7.0.2 without multibyte support (FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE) ?

2000-12-03 Thread Tom Lane
Oleg Bartunov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote a couple months ago: It's clear that we must use 'unsigned char' instead of 'char' and corrected version runs ok on both systems. That's why I suspect that gcc 2.95.2 has different default under FreeBSD which could cause problem with LC_CTYPE in 7.0.2

Re: [HACKERS] broken locale in 7.0.2 without multibyte support(FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE) ?

2000-09-18 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Tom Lane writes: Well, we could fix it either by propagating use of "unsigned char" all over the place, or by casting the arguments given to ctype macros. The former would be a lot more invasive because it would propagate to routines that don't actually call any ctype macros (since they'd

Re: [HACKERS] broken locale in 7.0.2 without multibyte support (FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE) ?

2000-09-16 Thread Oleg Bartunov
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Tom Lane wrote: Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2000 11:23:33 -0400 From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Oleg Bartunov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] broken locale in 7.0.2 without multibyte support (FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE) ? Oleg

Re: [HACKERS] broken locale in 7.0.2 without multibyte support (FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE) ?

2000-09-16 Thread Tom Lane
Oleg Bartunov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It's clear that we must use 'unsigned char' instead of 'char' and corrected version runs ok on both systems. That's why I suspect that gcc 2.95.2 has different default under FreeBSD which could cause problem with LC_CTYPE in 7.0.2 I think Peter