On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 06:54:15PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Looks like blow-back from the recent change in default GUC parameters.
>
> However, I think "update the expected output" is the wrong answer,
I completely agree and thus changed this example to only show variable
settings of variable the
Jeremy Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It looks like something broke the ECPG-Check recently. A number of
> buildfarm members are failing.
Looks like blow-back from the recent change in default GUC parameters.
However, I think "update the expected output" is the wrong answer,
because what we
It looks like something broke the ECPG-Check recently. A number of
buildfarm members are failing.
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, PG Build Farm wrote:
>
>
> The PGBuildfarm member mongoose had the following event on branch HEAD:
>
> Failed at Stage: ECPG-Check
>
> The snapshot timestamp for the build that t
