On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 5:22 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 19:13 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> Just to be clear, what you're saying is we want to change the policy
>>> that says "committer must be on list of appr
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 5:22 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 19:13 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Just to be clear, what you're saying is we want to change the policy
>> that says "committer must be on list of approved committers &&
>> commiter==author" to "committer must be
On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 19:13 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Just to be clear, what you're saying is we want to change the policy
> that says "committer must be on list of approved committers &&
> commiter==author" to "committer must be on list of approved committers
> && author must be on list of a
Magnus Hagander writes:
> Just to be clear, what you're saying is we want to change the policy
> that says "committer must be on list of approved committers &&
> commiter==author" to "committer must be on list of approved committers
> && author must be on list of approved committers"?
Works for m
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> A while ago I wanted to cherry-pick a patch from master to a back-branch
> that was initially committed by someone else. That was rejected because
> our git server requires author==committer. I don't think that
> restriction is particula
Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of miƩ sep 12 11:21:36 -0300 2012:
> A while ago I wanted to cherry-pick a patch from master to a back-branch
> that was initially committed by someone else. That was rejected because
> our git server requires author==committer. I don't think that
> restri
A while ago I wanted to cherry-pick a patch from master to a back-branch
that was initially committed by someone else. That was rejected because
our git server requires author==committer. I don't think that
restriction is particularly useful and should be lifted. I'm not saying
we should let any