Re: [HACKERS] git author vs committer

2013-01-05 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 5:22 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 19:13 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: >>> Just to be clear, what you're saying is we want to change the policy >>> that says "committer must be on list of appr

Re: [HACKERS] git author vs committer

2012-09-13 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 5:22 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 19:13 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> Just to be clear, what you're saying is we want to change the policy >> that says "committer must be on list of approved committers && >> commiter==author" to "committer must be

Re: [HACKERS] git author vs committer

2012-09-12 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 19:13 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > Just to be clear, what you're saying is we want to change the policy > that says "committer must be on list of approved committers && > commiter==author" to "committer must be on list of approved committers > && author must be on list of a

Re: [HACKERS] git author vs committer

2012-09-12 Thread Tom Lane
Magnus Hagander writes: > Just to be clear, what you're saying is we want to change the policy > that says "committer must be on list of approved committers && > commiter==author" to "committer must be on list of approved committers > && author must be on list of approved committers"? Works for m

Re: [HACKERS] git author vs committer

2012-09-12 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > A while ago I wanted to cherry-pick a patch from master to a back-branch > that was initially committed by someone else. That was rejected because > our git server requires author==committer. I don't think that > restriction is particula

Re: [HACKERS] git author vs committer

2012-09-12 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of miƩ sep 12 11:21:36 -0300 2012: > A while ago I wanted to cherry-pick a patch from master to a back-branch > that was initially committed by someone else. That was rejected because > our git server requires author==committer. I don't think that > restri

[HACKERS] git author vs committer

2012-09-12 Thread Peter Eisentraut
A while ago I wanted to cherry-pick a patch from master to a back-branch that was initially committed by someone else. That was rejected because our git server requires author==committer. I don't think that restriction is particularly useful and should be lifted. I'm not saying we should let any