Re: [HACKERS] oid2name and relfilenode

2002-10-15 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Bruce Momjian writes: Rename oid2name to relfilenode2name and install by default Actually, to be accurate, I think databases are stored based on their oid and tables/indexes are stored based on their relfilenode. That is pretty confusing. Do we still do the renaming? I don't think

Re: [HACKERS] oid2name and relfilenode

2002-10-15 Thread Bruce Momjian
Peter Eisentraut wrote: Bruce Momjian writes: Rename oid2name to relfilenode2name and install by default Actually, to be accurate, I think databases are stored based on their oid and tables/indexes are stored based on their relfilenode. That is pretty confusing. Do we still

Re: [HACKERS] oid2name and relfilenode

2002-10-15 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I will add these items to the TODO list, unless someone else votes. I was not thrilled with the idea of moving oid2name out of contrib either, but kept silent to see if someone else would complain first ... Basically I think that oid2name is a hacker's

Re: [HACKERS] oid2name and relfilenode

2002-10-15 Thread Bruce Momjian
OK, removed from TODO. I figured it was as useful as pg_controldata but can see what you say that those give information that you can't get any other way, while oid2name info can be gotten another way. You can look at the oid2name README for examples of its usage.

[HACKERS] oid2name and relfilenode

2002-10-12 Thread Bruce Momjian
Now that we are changing relfilenode in 7.3, I think we need to rename oid2name to relfilenode2name, and perhaps move it into the main tree. TODO item added: Rename oid2name to relfilenode2name and install by default -- Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us

Re: [HACKERS] oid2name and relfilenode

2002-10-12 Thread Justin Clift
Bruce Momjian wrote: Bruce Momjian wrote: Now that we are changing relfilenode in 7.3, I think we need to rename oid2name to relfilenode2name, and perhaps move it into the main tree. TODO item added: Rename oid2name to relfilenode2name and install by default Should it be

Re: [HACKERS] oid2name and relfilenode

2002-10-12 Thread Bruce Momjian
Justin Clift wrote: Bruce Momjian wrote: Bruce Momjian wrote: Now that we are changing relfilenode in 7.3, I think we need to rename oid2name to relfilenode2name, and perhaps move it into the main tree. TODO item added: Rename oid2name to relfilenode2name and install

Re: [HACKERS] oid2name and relfilenode

2002-10-12 Thread Bruce Momjian
Bruce Momjian wrote: Now that we are changing relfilenode in 7.3, I think we need to rename oid2name to relfilenode2name, and perhaps move it into the main tree. TODO item added: Rename oid2name to relfilenode2name and install by default Actually, to be accurate, I think databases