Vik Fearing writes:
> On 02/04/2016 01:44 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm looking into fixing the problem reported here:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1445a624-d09f-4b51-9c41-46ba1e2d6...@neveragain.de
>> namely that if we split a view into a table + rule (because of circular
>> dependencies)
On 02/04/2016 01:44 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm looking into fixing the problem reported here:
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1445a624-d09f-4b51-9c41-46ba1e2d6...@neveragain.de
> namely that if we split a view into a table + rule (because of circular
> dependencies), parallel pg_restore fails
I'm looking into fixing the problem reported here:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1445a624-d09f-4b51-9c41-46ba1e2d6...@neveragain.de
namely that if we split a view into a table + rule (because of circular
dependencies), parallel pg_restore fails to ensure that it creates any
triggers for the
