Re: [HACKERS] pgfoundry references in docs

2012-07-04 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 4:21 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote: > On Jul 4, 2012, at 9:15 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > >> Not really. We have nowhere else to recommend, since we don't run a >> replacement for it. And we really don't want to get involved in >> listing all the different third party sites ou

Re: [HACKERS] pgfoundry references in docs

2012-07-04 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Jul 4, 2012, at 9:15 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > Not really. We have nowhere else to recommend, since we don't run a > replacement for it. And we really don't want to get involved in > listing all the different third party sites out there. (For example, > we had a reference to sourceforge.net

Re: [HACKERS] pgfoundry references in docs

2012-07-04 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Albe Laurenz wrote: > Magnus Hagander wrote: >> Attached are two patches, one of which I'd like to apply. Open for >> discussion on which one. >> >> The smaller one, pgfoundry_1.diff, removes the suggestion to apply for >> new projects on pgfoundry. The reason for t

Re: [HACKERS] pgfoundry references in docs

2012-07-04 Thread Albe Laurenz
Magnus Hagander wrote: > Attached are two patches, one of which I'd like to apply. Open for > discussion on which one. > > The smaller one, pgfoundry_1.diff, removes the suggestion to apply for > new projects on pgfoundry. The reason for this being that pgfoundry > doesn't *accept* new projects an

Re: [HACKERS] pgfoundry references in docs

2012-07-04 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 10:01 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote: > On Jul 3, 2012, at 9:20 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > >> The smaller one, pgfoundry_1.diff, removes the suggestion to apply for >> new projects on pgfoundry. The reason for this being that pgfoundry >> doesn't *accept* new projects anymore.

Re: [HACKERS] pgfoundry references in docs

2012-07-04 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Dave Page wrote: > > > On Tuesday, July 3, 2012, Peter Geoghegan wrote: >> >> On 3 July 2012 20:20, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> > The second one removes the reference to pgfoundry completely. As a >> > step in the deprecation. >> > >> > I'd prefer to apply the secon

Re: [HACKERS] pgfoundry references in docs

2012-07-03 Thread Dave Page
On Tuesday, July 3, 2012, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On 3 July 2012 20:20, Magnus Hagander > > wrote: > > The second one removes the reference to pgfoundry completely. As a > > step in the deprecation. > > > > I'd prefer to apply the second one, but will settle for the first one > > if people object

Re: [HACKERS] pgfoundry references in docs

2012-07-03 Thread Peter Geoghegan
On 3 July 2012 20:20, Magnus Hagander wrote: > The second one removes the reference to pgfoundry completely. As a > step in the deprecation. > > I'd prefer to apply the second one, but will settle for the first one > if people object ;) I'd also prefer if you applied the second one. -- Peter Ge

Re: [HACKERS] pgfoundry references in docs

2012-07-03 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Jul 3, 2012, at 9:20 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > The smaller one, pgfoundry_1.diff, removes the suggestion to apply for > new projects on pgfoundry. The reason for this being that pgfoundry > doesn't *accept* new projects anymore. Should you not perhaps recommend that they go somewhere else?

[HACKERS] pgfoundry references in docs

2012-07-03 Thread Magnus Hagander
Attached are two patches, one of which I'd like to apply. Open for discussion on which one. The smaller one, pgfoundry_1.diff, removes the suggestion to apply for new projects on pgfoundry. The reason for this being that pgfoundry doesn't *accept* new projects anymore. The second one removes the