On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 1:05 AM, Andrew Gierth
and...@tao11.riddles.org.uk wrote:
Euler == Euler Taveira de Oliveira eu...@timbira.com writes:
Euler Ops... forgot to remove it from other test. It seems much
Euler better but far from the ideal. :( I've never taken a look at
Euler the
Hi,
I recently saw a complaint that a simple PL/PgSQL code is slower than PL/SQL.
I did some benchmark and confirmed it is. I coded the same function
(function2) in C just to compare with something. According to OP [1], the
PL/SQL seems to run more than 15x faster than PL/PgSQL code.
euler=#
Euler Taveira de Oliveira eu...@timbira.com writes:
I recently saw a complaint that a simple PL/PgSQL code is slower than PL/SQL.
I did some benchmark and confirmed it is. I coded the same function
(function2) in C just to compare with something. According to OP [1], the
PL/SQL seems to run
Tom Lane escreveu:
FWIW, the high showing of AllocSetReset in your profile suggests to me
that you're timing an assert-enabled build, which wouldn't exactly be
a fair comparison to an Oracle production build anyhow.
Ops... forgot to remove it from other test. It seems much better but far from
2009/9/24 Euler Taveira de Oliveira eu...@timbira.com:
Hi,
I recently saw a complaint that a simple PL/PgSQL code is slower than PL/SQL.
I did some benchmark and confirmed it is. I coded the same function
(function2) in C just to compare with something. According to OP [1], the
PL/SQL seems
Euler == Euler Taveira de Oliveira eu...@timbira.com writes:
Euler Ops... forgot to remove it from other test. It seems much
Euler better but far from the ideal. :( I've never taken a look at
Euler the pl/pgsql code but it could be nice if there would be two
Euler path codes: access-data and
